Literature DB >> 16781336

A comparative study of 2 implants used to repair inferior orbital wall bony defects: autogenous bone graft versus bioresorbable poly-L/DL-Lactide [P(L/DL)LA 70/30] plate.

Jehad Al-Sukhun1, Christian Lindqvist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare our clinical findings on the use of autogenous bone grafts and bioresorbable poly-L/DL-Lactide [P(L/DL)LA 70/30] implants to repair inferior orbital wall defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who suffered orbital blow-out fractures with >or=2 cm2 bony defect in the inferior orbital wall took part in the study. Each inferior orbital wall was reconstructed using either an autogenous bone graft or a triangle form plate of P(L/DL)LA 70/30. Computed tomography scans were taken before the operation and at 2 and 36 weeks postoperatively. To describe the distribution of complications and facilitate statistical analysis, we categorized our findings into diplopia, enophthalmos, numbness, gaze restrictions, size of bony defect after treatment, bone growth, and implant resorption. A comparative study was carried out using chi2 test and the Fisher exact test. We considered P < .05 to be statistically significant.
RESULTS: The clinical outcome was excellent in 19 of the 24 (79%) cases treated with autogenous bone grafts and in 13 of the 15 (87%) cases treated with P(L/DL)LA 70/30. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in overall type or number of complications. The most frequent type of complication found in both groups was enophthalmos, with 5 cases (bone graft, 3; P(L/DL)LA plates, 2). Diplopia was the second most frequent type of complication; however, both complications caused no need for the removal of the implants in either group.
CONCLUSION: Autogenous bone grafts and P(L/DL)LA 70/30 implant plates do not present statistically significant differences in the parameters studied. Taking into account the availability and the advantages of P(L/DL)LA 70/30 implants when compared with autogenous bone grafts, our results allow us to conclude that there is no compromise regarding successful bridging of orbital floor defects using biodegradable P(L/DL)LA 70/30 osteosyntheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781336     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Functional outcome after surgical treatment of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Paul W Poeschl; Arnulf Baumann; Guido Dorner; Guenter Russmueller; Rudolf Seemann; Ferenc Fabian; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of efficacy of mandible and iliac bone as autogenous bone graft for orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  Vipul Garg; Girish B Giraddi; Swati Roy
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-07-29

3.  Validity and accuracy of subciliary endoscopic-aided repair of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  W F Ezzat; M Abo El-Hasan; H Rabie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Shivam Patel; Tom Shokri; Kasra Ziai; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Comparison of Absorbable Mesh Plate versus Titanium-Dynamic Mesh Plate in Reconstruction of Blow-Out Fracture: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Woon Il Baek; Han Koo Kim; Woo Seob Kim; Tae Hui Bae
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Delayed onset porous polyethylene implant-related inflammation after orbital blowout fracture repair: four case reports.

Authors:  Orapan Aryasit; Danny S Ng; Alice S C Goh; Kyung In Woo; Yoon-Duck Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  The Role of Computer-Assisted Technology in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Kelvin K L Chong; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Clinical courses and degradation patterns of absorbable plates in facial bone fracture patients.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Jong Hun Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10-20

Review 9.  The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Akash Sivam; Natalie Enninghorst
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.