Literature DB >> 16781219

The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase.

Andrew T L Ong1, Patrick W Serruys, Frederick W Mohr, Marie-Claude Morice, A Pieter Kappetein, David R Holmes, Michael J Mack, Marcel van den Brand, Marie-Angele Morel, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Jeroen Kleijne, Joerg Koglin, Mary E Russell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in the treatment of coronary artery disease both surgically and percutaneously have rendered the major randomized trials historical. Furthermore, the restrictive criteria of previous trials excluded most patients treated in daily practice. Although coronary surgery is still considered the current, evidence-based, gold-standard treatment of left main (LM) and 3-vessel coronary disease, the added benefit of drug-eluting stents has further expanded the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) beyond less complex populations in daily practice. STUDY
DESIGN: The 1500-patient, prospective, multicenter, multinational (European and North American), randomized SYNTAX study with nested registries will enroll "all-comers." Consecutive patients with de novo 3-vessel disease (3VD) and/or LM disease will be screened for eligibility by the Heart Team (composed of an interventionalist, a cardiac surgeon, and the study coordinator) at each site and then allocated to either (1) the randomized cohort, if comparable revascularization can be achieved by either PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or (2) to one of the nested registries for CABG-ineligible patients (PCI registry) or for PCI-ineligible patients (CABG registry). Randomized patients will be stratified based on LM disease and diabetes by site. The primary end point for the randomized comparison is noninferiority of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events between the 2 groups at 1 year. To adequately project the expected enrollment rate per site, a run-in phase was mandated for each site interested in participating in the trial. Both cardiothoracic and interventional cardiology departments within the same institution were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their frequency of treatment of LM and 3VD over a retrospective 3-month period. IMPLICATIONS: By replacing most traditional inclusion and exclusion criteria with the real-world decision between the cardiothoracic surgeon and the interventionalist, this study will define the roles of CABG and PCI using drug-eluting stents in the contemporary management of LM and 3VD. Results of the run-in phase were used by the steering committee to determine eligibility and to project enrollment for each site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781219     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  34 in total

1.  Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Christian Herdeg; Bruno Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  PCI or CABG: which patients and at what cost?

Authors:  Tony Gershlick; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  To stent or not to stent?: A sterile debate.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Keith Channon; Adrian Banning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-21

4.  [Patients with coronary artery stents: when and how should operations be carried out?].

Authors:  W Rottbauer; H A Katus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S G Foussas; G Z Tsiaousis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 6.  Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Somjot S Brar; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Piroze M Davierwala; Freidrich W Mohr
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Integration of non-invasive functional assessments with anatomical risk stratification in complex coronary artery disease: the non-invasive functional SYNTAX score.

Authors:  Carlos Collet; Yoshinobu Onuma; Yosuke Miyazaki; Marie-Angèle Morel; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

9.  Estimates of absolute treatment benefit for individual patients required careful modeling of statistical interactions.

Authors:  David van Klaveren; Yvonne Vergouwe; Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Correlation of NLRP3 with severity and prognosis of coronary atherosclerosis in acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Altaf Afrasyab; Peng Qu; Yang Zhao; Kuang Peng; Hongyan Wang; Dayuan Lou; Nan Niu; Dajun Yuan
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.