Literature DB >> 16781163

Pattern of adverse drug reactions notified by spontaneous reporting in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital.

Jimmy Jose1, Padma G M Rao.   

Abstract

Hospital-based adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring and reporting programs aims to identify and quantify the risks associated with the use of drugs. The present study was undertaken to characterize the pattern of ADRs reported in a tertiary care teaching hospital (Kasturba Hospital, Manipal) in South India. The study was conducted based on the ADRs reported between March 2004 and February 2005 (12 months) to the ADR reporting unit of the hospital. Evaluation of the data was done for various parameters which included patient demographics, drug and reaction characteristics, and outcome of the reactions. Assessment was also done for causality, severity, preventability, and predisposing factors. A total of 408 ADRs which were reported during the 12 months period were evaluated. The overall incidence of ADR calculated from the patient population was 0.15%. At least one ADR was reported in 1.14% of the hospitalised patients and in 0.012% of the outpatients. No significant difference was seen in the overall incidence of ADRs observed in males and females. Incidence of ADRs among elderly adults and older adults (0.23%) were significantly higher than other age groups. Type A reactions (72.5%) accounted for majority of the reports and a greater share of the ADRs were described to be very common (43.4%) in the literature. Dermatological system (23.5%) was the most commonly affected organ system with skin rash (10.5%) as the most frequently reported reaction. Antineoplastic agents (21.8%) was the drug class most commonly involved, while phenytoin (7.8%) was the individual drug most frequently reported. The suspected drug was withdrawn for the management of the ADR in majority (56.6%) of the reports. In 74.8% of the reports the patient recovered from the reaction at the time of evaluation. Upon causality assessment, majority of the reports were rated as probable (53.7%). Mild and moderate reactions accounted for 50.5 and 43.9%, respectively. In 28.7% of the reports, the reaction was considered to be preventable. At least one predisposing factor was present in 79.9% of the reports and the most common predisposing factors associated were polypharmacy and multiple disease state. Evaluating the relationship between patient characteristics and reaction characteristics, type A reactions were more common among elderly adults (85.92%) and type B reactions more common in adults (35.01%) compared to other age groups. In conclusion, the pattern of ADRs reported in our hospital is comparable with the results of studies conducted in hospital set up elsewhere. Our evaluations revealed opportunities for interventions especially for the preventable ADRs to ensure safer drug use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781163     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2006.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  52 in total

1.  Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  J Kurian; J Mathew; K Sowjanya; K R K Chaitanya; M Ramesh; J Sebastian; D Narayanappa
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  The profile of voluntary reported adverse drug reactions at a tertiary care hospital: a fifteen month prospective study.

Authors:  Amit Dang; P N Bhandare
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11

3.  Evaluation of potential drug - drug interactions in general medicine ward of teaching hospital in southern India.

Authors:  Akram Ahmad; Muhammad Umair Khan; Irfanul Haque; Rahul Ivan; Ram Dasari; Megha Revanker; A Pravina; Sheetal Kuriakose
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 4.  Methods for assessing the preventability of adverse drug events: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katja Marja Hakkarainen; Karolina Andersson Sundell; Max Petzold; Staffan Hägg
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Comparative epidemiology of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions in adults and children and their impact on cost and hospital stay--a systematic review.

Authors:  Lateef Mohiuddin Khan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  First Indian study evaluating role of biochemical investigations and diagnostic tools in detection of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Vishal R Tandon; Vijay Khajuria; Kapila Raina; Vivek Mahajan; Aman Sharma; Zahid Gillani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

7.  Pilot study on developing a decision support tool for guiding re-administration of chemotherapeutic agent after a serious adverse drug reaction.

Authors:  Pei Yi Loke; Lita Chew; Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Effect of an intervention on the features of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported in a hospital.

Authors:  Gloria Cereza; Antonia Agustí; Consuelo Pedrós; Antonio Vallano; Cristina Aguilera; Immaculada Danés; Xavier Vidal; Josep Maria Arnau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  A pharmacovigilance study of antihypertensive medicines at a South delhi hospital.

Authors:  A Hussain; M Aqil; M S Alam; M R Khan; P Kapur; K K Pillai
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.975

10.  Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India.

Authors:  R Arulmani; S D Rajendran; B Suresh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.