Literature DB >> 16780872

Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database.

Gabrielle A Reeves1, Timothy J Dallman, Oliver C Redfern, Adrian Akpor, Christine A Orengo.   

Abstract

The CATH database of domain structures has been used to explore the structural variation of homologous domains in 294 well populated domain structure superfamilies, each containing at least three sequence diverse relatives. Our analyses confirm some previously detected trends relating sequence divergence to structural variation but for a much larger dataset and in some superfamilies the new data reveal exceptional structural variation. Use of a new algorithm (2DSEC) to analyse variability in secondary structure compositions across a superfamily sheds new light on how structures evolve. 2DSEC detects inserted secondary structures that embellish the core of conserved secondary structures found throughout the superfamily. Analysis showed that for 56% of highly populated superfamilies (>9 sequence diverse relatives), there are twofold or more increases in the numbers of secondary structures in some relatives. In some families fivefold increases occur, sometimes modifying the fold of the domain. Manual inspection of secondary structure insertions or embellishments in 48 particularly variable superfamilies revealed that although these insertions were usually discontiguous in the sequence they were often co-located in 3D resulting in a larger structural motif that often modified the geometry of the active site or the surface conformation promoting diverse domain partnerships and protein interactions. These observations, supported by automatic analysis of all well populated CATH families, suggest that accretion of small secondary structure insertions may provide a simple mechanism for evolving new functions in diverse relatives. Some layered domain architectures (e.g. mainly-beta and alpha-beta sandwiches) that recur highly in the genomes more frequently exploit these types of embellishments to modify function. In these architectures, aggregation occurs most often at the edges, top or bottom of the beta-sheets. Information on structural variability across domain superfamilies has been made available through the CATH Dictionary of Homologous Structures (DHS).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16780872     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  55 in total

1.  Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.

Authors:  Yifeng David Yang; Preston Spratt; Hao Chen; Changsoon Park; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 2.  Protein folds and protein folding.

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  Detailed analysis of function divergence in a large and diverse domain superfamily: toward a refined protocol of function classification.

Authors:  Benoit H Dessailly; Oliver C Redfern; Alison L Cuff; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Classification of proteins with shared motifs and internal repeats in the ECOD database.

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Lisa N Kinch; Yuxing Liao; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design.

Authors:  D Rognan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Exploiting protein structure data to explore the evolution of protein function and biological complexity.

Authors:  Russell L Marsden; Juan A G Ranea; Antonio Sillero; Oliver Redfern; Corin Yeats; Michael Maibaum; David Lee; Sarah Addou; Gabrielle A Reeves; Timothy J Dallman; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Exploring the structure and function paradigm.

Authors:  Oliver C Redfern; Benoit Dessailly; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Markus Fischer; Barry Honig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Towards prediction of metabolic products of polyketide synthases: an in silico analysis.

Authors:  Gitanjali Yadav; Rajesh S Gokhale; Debasisa Mohanty
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.