Literature DB >> 16780772

Impact of automatic threshold capture on pulse generator longevity.

Ruo-han Chen1, Ke-ping Chen, Fang-zheng Wang, Wei Hua, Shu Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The automatic, threshold tracking, pacing algorithm developed by St. Jude Medical, verifies ventricular capture beat by beat by recognizing the evoked response following each pacemaker stimulus. This function was assumed to be not only energy saving but safe. This study estimated the extension in longevity obtained by AutoCapture (AC) compared with pacemakers programmed to manually optimized, nominal output.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients who received the St. Jude Affinity series pacemaker were included in the study. The following measurements were taken: stimulation and sensing threshold, impedance of leads, evoked response and polarization signals by 3501 programmer during followup, battery current and battery impedance under different conditions. For longevity comparison, ventricular output was programmed under three different conditions: (1) AC on; (2) AC off with nominal output, and (3) AC off with pacing output set at twice the pacing threshold with a minimum of 2.0 V. Patients were divided into two groups: chronic threshold is higher or lower than 1 V. The efficacy of AC was evaluated.
RESULTS: Current drain in the AC on group, AC off with optimized programming or nominal output was (14.33 +/- 2.84) mA, (16.74 +/- 2.75) mA and (18.4 +/- 2.44) mA, respectively (AC on or AC off with optimized programming vs. nominal output, P < 0.01). Estimated longevity was significantly extended by AC on when compared with nominal setting [(103 +/- 27) months, (80 +/- 24) months, P < 0.01). Furthermore, compared with the optimized programming, AC extends the longevity when the pacing threshold is higher than 1 V.
CONCLUSION: AC could significantly prolong pacemaker longevity; especially in the patient with high pacing threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16780772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  3 in total

1.  Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.

Authors:  Francis D Murgatroyd; Erhard Helmling; Bernd Lemke; Bernd Eber; Christian Mewis; Judith van der Meer-Hensgens; Yanping Chang; Vladimir Khalameizer; Amos Katz
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Disparity in left ventricular stimulation among different pacing configurations in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jose F Huizar; Karoly Kaszala; Jayanthi Koneru; Marcin Kowalski; Leroy R Thacker; Mark A Wood; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-22

3.  Feasibility of Atrial AutoCapture™ to Detect Atrial Evoked Response: Experience from 102 Patients Implanted with Dual-chamber Pacemakers.

Authors:  Hai-Long Si; Qin Qin; Bing-Rang Zhao; Gang Chen; Ya-Ru Lu; Lu Kou; Jing-Yu Yang; Wen-Hua Lin; Zi-Wen Ren
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.