Literature DB >> 16780529

A general model for the evolution of mutualisms.

K R Foster1, T Wenseleers.   

Abstract

The evolution of mutualisms presents a puzzle. Why does selection favour cooperation among species rather than cheaters that accept benefits but provide nothing in return? Here we present a general model that predicts three key factors will be important in mutualism evolution: (i) high benefit to cost ratio, (ii) high within-species relatedness and (iii) high between-species fidelity. These factors operate by moderating three types of feedback benefit from mutualism: cooperator association, partner-fidelity feedback and partner choice. In defining the relationship between these processes, our model also allows an assessment of their relative importance. Importantly, the model suggests that phenotypic feedbacks (partner-fidelity feedback, partner choice) are a more important explanation for between-species cooperation than the development of genetic correlations among species (cooperator association). We explain the relationship of our model to existing theories and discuss the empirical evidence for our predictions.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16780529     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  92 in total

1.  Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation.

Authors:  Les Dethlefsen; David A Relman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.

Authors:  Todd M Palmer; Daniel F Doak; Maureen L Stanton; Judith L Bronstein; E Toby Kiers; Truman P Young; Jacob R Goheen; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism.

Authors:  E Glen Weyl; Megan E Frederickson; Douglas W Yu; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamics of the association between a long-lived understory myrmecophyte and its specific associated ants.

Authors:  Jérôme Orivel; Luc Lambs; Pierre-Jean G Malé; Céline Leroy; Julien Grangier; Thierry Otto; Angélique Quilichini; Alain Dejean
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Variation and the response to variation as a basis for successful cooperation.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  What traits are carried on mobile genetic elements, and why?

Authors:  D J Rankin; E P C Rocha; S P Brown
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Host-microbial symbiosis in the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract and the Lactobacillus reuteri paradigm.

Authors:  Jens Walter; Robert A Britton; Stefan Roos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Host-bacterial symbiosis in health and disease.

Authors:  Janet Chow; S Melanie Lee; Yue Shen; Arya Khosravi; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.543

10.  Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms.

Authors:  Kevin R Foster; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.