Literature DB >> 16780024

Pap smear screening in women under 30 in the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program, with a comparison of immediate biopsy vs Pap smear triage of moderate dysplasia.

Jan F Nygård1, Mari Nygård, Gry Baadstrand Skare, Steiner Osterbø Thoresen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Top provide population based estimates of Pap smear screening results among women under 30 and to compare the outcomes of 2 triage options for women under 30 with a moderate dysplastic Pap smear: immediate biopsy vs. Pap smear follow-up. STUDY
DESIGN: All Pap smears, histologically verified cervical intraepithelial lesion (CIN) 2/3 and invasive cervical cancer in 1999-2002 from women in Norway under 30 in 2000-2002 were analyzed. Due to different triage recommendations in different laboratories, 836 women under 30 with a moderately dysplastic Pap smear were recommended for immediate biopsy, while 109 were recommended for a Pap smear within 6 months. Risk estimates for triage outcome were estimated by multinominal logistic regression.
RESULTS: The prevalence of squamous intraepithelial lesion was highest around 20 years. The first moderate dysplasia was diagnosed at age 16, as was CIN 2/3. Of the women with Pap smear triage, one third were diagnosed with a CIN 2+ lesion, one third had a normal outcome, while the last third were in uncertain state 12 months later. Among those recommended for immediate biopsy, nearly 70% were diagnosed with a CIN 2+, thus having odds of 4.2 (95% CI 2.5-7.1) higher than did women with Pap smear triage of being diagnosed with CIN2+ 12 months later.
CONCLUSION: The choice of triage has a profound impact on the proportion of young women diagnosed with CIN 2+ after a moderately dysplastic Pap smear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16780024     DOI: 10.1159/000325957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  8 in total

1.  Cytology and human papillomavirus testing 6 to 12 months after ASCUS or LSIL cytology in organized screening to predict high-grade cervical neoplasia between screening rounds.

Authors:  Ameli Tropé; Katrine D Sjøborg; Mari Nygård; Kjetil Røysland; Suzanne Campbell; G Cecilie Alfsen; Christine M Jonassen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Screening for cervical cancer: when theory meets reality.

Authors:  Mari Nygård
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.

Authors:  E A Burger; J D Ortendahl; S Sy; I S Kristiansen; J J Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  Mari Nygård; Anne-Kjersti Daltveit; Steinar O Thoresen; Jan F Nygård
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Comparative effectiveness study on human papillomavirus detection methods used in the cervical cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Mari Nygård; Kjetil Røysland; Suzanne Campbell; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Targeting human papillomavirus to reduce the burden of cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer and pre-invasive neoplasia: establishing the baseline for surveillance.

Authors:  Mari Nygård; Bo Terning Hansen; Joakim Dillner; Christian Munk; Kristján Oddsson; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Maria Hortlund; Kai-Li Liaw; Erik J Dasbach; Susanne Krüger Kjær
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The potential of RNA as a target for national screening of pre-cancer.

Authors:  Frank Karlsen; Margaret Muturi; Cosmas Muyabwa; Lars E Roseng; Serge Bigabwa; Byamungu Chihongola; Lucy Muchiri
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2018-12-21

8.  Awareness, perception and factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Chizoma Millicent Ndikom; Bola Abosede Ofi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.