OBJECTIVE: To use fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using ribosomal RNA (rRNA) oligonucleotide probes as the target nucleic acid for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. STUDY DESIGN: Suitable sequences selected from the rRNA sequence of C trachomatis were labeled with a fluorescent dye and used in FISH for detecting chlamydial inclusion bodies and/ or elementary bodies in paraformaldehyde-fixed urogenital swab samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the FISH assay were compared with those of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using plasmid primers. Positive known C trachomatis-infected McCoy cells were used as positive controls. Urogenital swab specimens that were C trachomatis negative on culture and PCR were used as negative controls. RESULT: Among the 128 samples included in the study, FISH was positive in 28 (21.8%) and PCR in 33 (25.7%). A significant correlation was found between the 2 detection methods. Results of PCR and FISH were consistent in 115 of the 128 samples (R = 0.89). Thirteen samples showed discordant results. Of these, 9 FISH negative samples were PCR positive and 4 FISH positive samples were PCR negative. CONCLUSION: FISH was a highly specific and fairly sensitive technique for detecting C trachomatis. Signal amplification techniques and use of different fluorophores may further increase the sensitivity of this technique.
OBJECTIVE: To use fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using ribosomal RNA (rRNA) oligonucleotide probes as the target nucleic acid for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. STUDY DESIGN: Suitable sequences selected from the rRNA sequence of C trachomatis were labeled with a fluorescent dye and used in FISH for detecting chlamydial inclusion bodies and/ or elementary bodies in paraformaldehyde-fixed urogenital swab samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the FISH assay were compared with those of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using plasmid primers. Positive known C trachomatis-infected McCoy cells were used as positive controls. Urogenital swab specimens that were C trachomatis negative on culture and PCR were used as negative controls. RESULT: Among the 128 samples included in the study, FISH was positive in 28 (21.8%) and PCR in 33 (25.7%). A significant correlation was found between the 2 detection methods. Results of PCR and FISH were consistent in 115 of the 128 samples (R = 0.89). Thirteen samples showed discordant results. Of these, 9 FISH negative samples were PCR positive and 4 FISH positive samples were PCR negative. CONCLUSION: FISH was a highly specific and fairly sensitive technique for detecting C trachomatis. Signal amplification techniques and use of different fluorophores may further increase the sensitivity of this technique.