Literature DB >> 16779595

A more cost-effective EMAP benthic macrofaunal sampling protocol.

Steven P Ferraro1, Faith A Cole, Anthony R Olsen.   

Abstract

Benthic macrofaunal sampling protocols in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) are to collect 30 to 50 random benthic macrofauna [defined as animals retained on a 0.5 mm (East and Gulf Coasts, USA) or a 1.0 mm mesh sieve (West Coast, USA)] samples per reporting unit using a 0.044 m(2) (East and Gulf Coasts) or 0.1 m(2) (West Coast) grab. Benthic macrofaunal community conditions in the reporting unit are characterized by cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) on end points of interest, such as number of species (S), abundance (A), and Shannon-Wiener diversity (H'). An EMAP and a companion field study were conducted concurrently in Tillamook Bay (Oregon, USA) to compare the cost effectiveness of benthic macrofauna samples collected using the EMAP West Coast (0.1 m(2) x >or=7 cm deep, 1.0 mm mesh), a 0.01 m(2) x 5 cm deep, 1.0 mm mesh, and a 0.01 m(2) x 5 cm deep, 0.5 mm mesh sampling protocol. Cost was estimated in relative laboratory sample-processing time. Sampling protocols were judged equally effective for EMAP purposes if, after linear transformation to adjust for scale changes in end point distributions, their S, A, and H' CDFs were not significantly different. The 0.01 m(2) x 5 cm deep, 1.0 mm mesh sampling protocol was the most cost effective.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16779595     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-7360-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Ecological condition of the estuaries of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States.

Authors:  J K Summers
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  The ecological condition of south Florida estuaries.

Authors:  J M Macauley; J K Summers; V D Engle; L C Harwell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends.

Authors:  J J Messer; R A Linthurst; W S Overton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Optimum macrobenthic sampling protocol for detecting pollution impacts in the Southern California Bight.

Authors:  S P Ferraro; R C Swartz; F A Cole; W A Deben
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities.

Authors:  K R Clarke; R M Warwick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessing differences in macrofaunal assemblages as a factor of sieve mesh size, distance between samples, and time of sampling.

Authors:  Lenaïg G Hemery; Kristin K Politano; Sarah K Henkel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.