Literature DB >> 16779574

A study of sorptive loss patterns for reduced sulfur compounds in the use of the bag sampling method.

Ki-Hyun Kim1.   

Abstract

In this work, the basic properties of the bag sampling method were examined and characterized in terms of recovery rate with respect to four reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) including H2S, CH3SH, DMS, and DMDS. For this comparative study, two types of calibration approaches were performed to evaluate the relative RSC loss due to bag sampling. As a reference calibration tool, a syringe dilution (SD) method was applied. The working standards prepared by diluting the primary standard in a gas-tight syringe (as a mixing chamber) were injected to the GC/PFPD through a loop-injection system to yield a background calibration information. In contrast, the target calibration was performed based on a bag dilution (BD) method. To this end, working standards for multiple calibration points were prepared by two different bag types (Tedlar bag (TB) and polyester bag (PB)). These standards were then drawn by the same syringe and injected into the GC/PFPD via loop. On the basis of these comparative analyses, both absolute and relative differences in RSC recovery rates (RR) were evaluated (e.g., comparison of wall-loss effect). The results indicate that TB has a mean RR of 87% for the four RSC with their values ranging from 82 (CH3SH) to 91% (DMDS). On the other hand, the results of PB generally exhibited slightly reduced RR with their mean values of 77% (range: 73% of H2S to 83% of DMS). The results of this study generally suggest that the losses of RSC samples, while inevitable with the bag sampling method, exhibit certain patterns between different RSCs and between different grab sampling materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16779574     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9195-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Quantification of volatile sulfur compounds in complex gaseous matrices by solid-phase microextraction.

Authors:  Annika T Nielsen; Susanne Jonsson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  The evaluation of recovery rate associated with the use of thermal desorption systems for the analysis of atmospheric reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) using the GC/PFPD method.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Do-Weon Ju; Sang-Woo Joo
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  Quantitation of the losses of gaseous sulfur compounds to enclosure walls.

Authors:  W C Kuster; P D Goldan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Short-term distributions of reduced sulfur compounds in the ambient air surrounding a large landfill facility.

Authors:  K-H Kim; Y-J Choi; S-I Oh; J H Sa; E-C Jeon; Y S Koo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Some insights into the gas chromatographic determination of reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) in air.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ammonia diffusion through Nalophan double bags: effect of concentration gradient reduction.

Authors:  Selena Sironi; Lidia Eusebio; Laura Capelli; Emanuela Boiardi; Renato Del Rosso
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-11-24

2.  H2S Loss through Nalophan™ Bags: Contributions of Adsorption and Diffusion.

Authors:  Lidia Eusebio; Laura Capelli; Selena Sironi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2017-06-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.