Literature DB >> 16778601

Genetic evaluation of suspected osteogenesis imperfecta (OI).

Peter H Byers1, Deborah Krakow, Mark E Nunes, Melanie Pepin.   

Abstract

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is probably the most common genetic form of fracture predisposition. The term OI encompasses a broad range of clinical presentations that may be first apparent from early in pregnancies to late in life, reflecting the extent of bone deformity and fracture predisposition at different stages of development or postnatal ages. Depending on the age of presentation, OI can be difficult to distinguish from some other genetic and nongenetic causes of fractures, including nonaccidental injury (abuse). The strategies for evaluation and the testing discussed here provide guidelines for evaluation that should help to distinguish among causes for fracture and bone deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16778601      PMCID: PMC3110960          DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000223557.54670.aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


OVERVIEW

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is an inherited disorder of connective tissue characterized by bone fragility and fractures; other clinical features include blue sclerae, adult onset hearing loss and joint laxity.1 The severity ranges from lethal in the perinatal period to occasional fracture. Inheritance is generally autosomal dominant but new mutations are common and recessive inheritance occurs. In most instances (about 90%), a mutation in one of the two genes (COL1A1 and COL1A2) that encode the chains of type I collagen, the major protein of bone, accounts for the phenotype.2 Less frequently, yet-to-be-identified genes are responsible.3–5 The diagnosis of OI is considered at different times: during fetal development, at birth, in childhood, or less often in adults. Regardless of the time at which the diagnosis is suspected, the first line of evaluation is a detailed medical history, family history, physical examination, appropriate radiographs and routine lab testing. If these do not lead to diagnosis, then specialized genetic testing is warranted. We have organized the approach to diagnosis of OI in an age-specific fashion.

OI: IDENTIFICATION IN PREGNANCY

OI may be suspected in a fetus at different gestational ages, depending on whether the clinical question is raised by family history or by routine ultrasound examination.

In the presence of a positive family history of OI

The fetus is usually at a 50% risk for OI when a parent has OI. When only a sibling has OI, the risk varies from 0% to 50%, reflecting the proportion of parental gametes that have the mutation in a mosaic pattern.6 Both targeted ultrasound examinations and laboratory testing (protein-based or DNA-based) can be considered. Fetal Ultrasound Examination: Ultrasound examination, trans-abdominal (TA) or trans-vaginal (TV)7,8 should be offered as early as 13–14 weeks gestation for a pregnancy at risk for the severe, lethal form of OI (OI type II) and 16–20 weeks for one at risk for OI type III. Ultrasound identification of OI type I and OI type IV has been reported infrequently after 20 weeks gestation on the basis of fetal fracture, but cannot be relied upon.8 (Table 1, Fig. 1)
Table 1

Ultrasound identification of OI during pregnancy (Listed in order of first ultrasound detection)

TypeGeneticsClinical findingsUltrasound findingsFirst ultrasound detection
OI II lethal perinatalAutosomal dominantLethal perinatal type: Undermineralized skull, micromelic bones, “beaded” ribs on x-ray, bone deformity, platyspondylyUndermineralization, broad, crumpled and shortened limbs, thin beaded ribs, fractures, angulation or bowing of long bones, normal appearing hands, deformable calvarium≥14 wks
OI IIIAutosomal dominantProgressively deforming type: Moderate deformity of limbs at birth, sclerael hue varies, very short stature, dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI)Thin ribs, short limbs, fractures, undermineralized skull, long bone length falls away from normal 16–18 weeks≥18 wks
OI IVAutosomal dominantNormal sclerae, mild/moderate limb deformity with fracture, variable short stature, DI, some hearing lossRarely, long bone bowing and/or fractureAfter 20 wks but not common
OI IAutosomal dominantFractures with little or no limb deformity, blue sclerae, normal stature, hearing loss, DIRarely, long bone bowing or fracture>20 wks but not common
OI VAutosomal dominantSimilar to OI IV plus calcification of interosseous membrane of forearm, radial head dislocation, hyperplastic callus formationUnknownNot described
OI VIUnknownMore fractures than OI type IV, vertebral compression fractures, no DIUnknownNot described
OI VIIAutosomal recessiveCongenital fractures, blue sclerae, early deformity of legs, coxa vara, osteopeniaUnknownNot described
Fig. 1.

Strategies for Prenatal Diagnosis (weeks gestation). From Pepin M, Atkinson M, Starman BJ, Byers PH. Strategies and outcomes of prenatal diagnosis for osteogenesis imperfecta: a review of biochemical and molecular studies completed in 129 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:559–570. ©John Wiley & Sons Limited. Reproduced with permission.

Laboratory Testing

For the pregnancy at risk for most forms of OI (OI type II, III or IV) on the basis of family history, biochemical analysis of type I collagen synthesized by cultured chorionic villi cells (CVS) can be offered if collagen screening studies have been completed on the affected parent or a previous affected infant and shown to be abnormal.6 The time from CVS biopsy to final diagnosis is about 3–4 weeks. The same biochemical assay cannot be performed on amniocytes as they synthesize inadequate amounts of type I procollagen. Prenatal diagnosis by biochemical testing is not available for the identification of OI type I. The reduced synthesis of type I collagen chains typically seen in cells from individuals with OI type I cannot be detected reliably in CVS cells. Mutation analysis can be performed for all types of OI, if the mutation in the family is known, using DNA extracted from CVS cells or amniocytes. The time from initial tissue sampling to test result is about 7–14 days.

In routine care of the pregnant woman with a negative family history of OI

Ultrasound detection of skeletal anomalies may raise the suspicion of OI. When micromelia and undermineralization of the skeleton are found at 14–16 weeks gestation, the major differential includes OI type II, achondrogenesis types IA, IB and II, and autosomal recessive (severe infantile) hypophosphatasia (Table 2). In experienced centers, the sonographic evaluation will generally lead to a specific diagnosis. For most disorders, the gene(s) in which causative mutations lie are known but, because most mutations are unique to a family or individual, their identification may take several weeks. As a result, a discussion about pregnancy continuation or termination generally rests on sonographic evaluation (Table 2).
Table 2

Ultrasound differential diagnosis at 16 –18 weeks gestation

Differential diagnosisEarliest ultrasound identificationGeneticsCharacteristicsPossible lab testing
OI type II lethal type 1/60,00014–16 wksADBeaded ribs, micromelic limbs, fractures, undermineralized skullCOL1A1/COL1A2 mutation identification
Achondrogenesis type IB16 wksARShort limbs, short ribs, barrel shaped thorax & irregular scapulae, undermineralized sacral bones & skull, short undermineralized vertebral bodiesDiastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter (DTDST) gene mutation identification14
Achondrogenesis type IA14–16 wksARShort limbs, short ribs, splayed ends, rib fractures, undermineralized bones and skull, bowing, absent ossification of vertebral bodies & sacrumUnknown
Achondrogenes is type II14–16 wksADExtreme micromelia, barrel shaped thorax, undermineralized skull, bowing, absent ossification vertebral bodies & sacrumCOL2A1 mutation identification15
Perinatal/infantile Hypophosphatasia (1/100,000)14–16 wksARProfound undermineralization of skeleton, underossification of skull and extremities, deformed limbsTNSALP mutations16
Thamatrophoric sydplasia (1/30,000)16 wksADVery short limgs, “telephone receiver femurs.” Normal mineralzation, small chestFGFR3 mutations17
When termination is performed on the basis of ultrasound findings, the specific diagnosis, including OI, can be determined by biochemical study of cultured cells or analysis of DNA from the fetus. Detailed postmortem evaluation and x-rays of the fetus are a necessary adjunct to diagnosis. If the pregnancy is continued to delivery, the genetic evaluation can be completed in the newborn period. OI type III is seldom identified before 18 weeks gestation and confirmation of the diagnosis often requires serial ultrasounds to track evolving findings. The prenatal phenotype overlaps that of perinatal hypophosphatasia (frequency of 1/100,000) (Table 3).
Table 3

Ultrasound differential diagnosis at 18–20 weeks gestation

Differential diagnosisGestational weeksGeneticsCharacteristicsPossible lab testing
OI type III18–20 wksADShortened limbs, thin ribs, fractures/angulation/bowingCOL1A1/COL1A2
Perinatal/infantile<20 wksARProfound undermineralization of skeleton, underossification of skull and extremities, deformed limbsTNSALP mutations
Hypophosphatasia (1/100,000)

OI: IDENTIFICATION IN CHILDHOOD

In infancy and childhood, the clinical examination is the key first step in evaluation of the child with suspected OI. The evaluation requires familiarity with the natural history and variation in clinical presentation of OI, particularly in the infant or toddler. Mild forms of OI may go unnoticed by even experienced general clinicians. Referral to an experienced physician familiar with the range of clinical expression of OI (such as a medical geneticist) is relatively inexpensive in comparison to laboratory testing and may be all that is necessary to secure the diagnosis. There are several clinical circumstances that lead to the evaluation of a child for a brittle bone disorder such as OI.

Family history of OI

When a parent or relative is affected, the physical examination and radiographic findings in the child may be sufficient for clinical confirmation of OI. Exclusion of the diagnosis may be more difficult in individuals with mild forms. If the infant or toddler has few or equivocal findings, the clinician may adopt a wait and watch approach. If the family wishes to pursue prenatal diagnosis in a subsequent pregnancy, then laboratory testing (biochemical or DNA-based testing) is necessary.

Frequent fractures

At birth, OI types II and III are generally recognized on clinical and radiologic grounds and the clinical diagnosis is usually unequivocal.1 Genetic evaluation and counseling is recommended for confirmation and discussion about natural history, treatment and prenatal diagnosis in future pregnancies. In childhood, in the absence of a positive family history, most children newly diagnosed with OI are identified after one or more fractures. The severity of the phenotype varies from the progressive deforming type (OI type III) to the mild phenotype of OI type I (see Table 3). The differential diagnosis for frequent fracture in childhood is relatively limited and includes both inherited and acquired conditions. Hypophosphatasia, osteopetrosis with renal tubular acidosis, hypophosphatemic osteomalacia (rickets) and nonaccidental injury should be considered.

Short stature, blue sclerae and dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI)

Sometimes, the evaluation for OI in childhood is prompted by recognition of blue sclerae, conductive hearing loss, dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI) or during an evaluation for short stature. Blue sclerae are present in all children with OI type I and are, at times, dramatic. Roughly 20% of families with OI type I have DI. Infants and toddlers with OI type IV may have light blue sclerae and usually have DI, which may be subtle. Some children may be identified by short stature as about a third of individuals with OI type IV are less than the third percent for height in childhood (Table 4).9
Table 4

Clinical presentation and Genetic differential diagnosis of fractures in childhood

TypeInheritanceClinical phenotypeTest
OI type IIADLethal perinatal, undermineralized skull, beaded ribs, compressed femurs, long bone deformity, platyspondylyBiochemical or Molecular
OI type IIIAD/ARProgressively deforming bones, moderate deformity at birth, sclerae hue varies, very short stature, DIBiochemical or Molecular
OI type IADFracture with little or no deformity, blue sclerae, normal stature, hearing lossBiochemical or Molecular
OI type IVADNormal scleare, mild/moderate bone deformity with fracture, variable short stature, DI, some hearing lossBiochemical or Molecular
OI type VADSimilar to OI IV plus calcification of interosseous membrane of forearm, radial head dislocation, hyperplastic callus formationUnknown
OI type VIAD or ARMore fractures than OI IV, vertebral compression fractures, no DIUnknown
OI type VIIARCongenital fractures, blue sclerae, early deformity of lower extremities, coxa vara, osteopeniaUnknown
Hypophosphatasia, perinatal and infantile form (1/100,000)ARSevere undermineralization, bone deformity, fracturesTNSALP mutations
Hypophosphatasia (childhood type)AD/ARPremature loss of teeth, rachitic bone changes, fracture, undermineralization of bonesUrinary phosphoethanolamine, plasma plasma ALP, TNSALPL gene testing
Juvenile Paget’s diseaseARrapidly remodeling bone, osteopenia, fractures, progressive skeletal deformityTNFRSF11B mutations18
Bruck syndromeAROsteoporosis, joint contractures and fractures and short staturePLOD2 mutations1921
Osteopetrosis with renal tubular acidosisARBefore 2 years of age, fractures, short stature and delayed development. RTA, cerebral calcifications, mental retardation and dental malocclusionCAII mutations22
Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia “rickets”AD, XLDBefore 2, osteomalacia and poor growth. Later hypophosphatemiaLow serum phosphorus, elevated alk.phosphatase, low urine calciumFGF23, HYP genes23
Non-accidental injury-Unexplained fractures in infancy

The infant or toddler with “unexplained fractures”

In the first year of life, the presence of fractures for which an explanation is not provided or for which the stated mechanism of injury is not consistent with the fracture type raises a concern for nonaccidental injury (NAI). As NAI is the leading cause of fractures in infancy, a child abuse evaluation is warranted in such circumstances (http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/). If a biological basis for brittle bones is suspected and clinical examination is not definitive, then laboratory testing for OI and select metabolic bone disorders is generally appropriate. On clinical examination, if an infant with unexplained fractures has few features of OI, as may be the case with OI type I, IV, V and VI, it may be difficult to confirm or exclude the diagnosis on the basis of family history, history and physical examination alone, particularly in the 0–8 months age group. Some clinical features of OI overlap with normal findings in infancy. For example: blue sclerae occur in normal infants before 12 months of age. However, with appropriate clinical evaluation, the diagnoses of OI type I and III are rarely in question. Infants with OI type IV, V and VI, with normal sclerae and normal length, may present only with fracture. Infants with OI can be missed on clinical evaluation and declared victims of NAI based on radiographic findings alone.10,11 Biochemical or DNA diagnostic testing, though not 100% sensitive, may be the best way to attempt to guard against these rare outcomes.10,11 When the index of clinical suspicion of OI is high, the physician may feel compelled to request testing to provide laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis in order to curtail additional Child Protective Services referrals. The first studies10 evaluating the usefulness and sensitivity of collagen screening for identification of OI in children with unexplained fractures suggested that the physical examination by a clinician familiar with OI was as sensitive as biochemical diagnostic testing for identifying the child with OI. A recent review of biochemical testing completed on cells from 262 infants with OI versus infants with unexplained fractures described 3 children who were not identified as affected by comprehensive clinical evaluation in whom a type I collagen abnormality was detected on biochemical testing. The collagen abnormality identified in each instance was characteristic for OI – two with OI type I and one with OI type IV The clinical findings of the three infants in whom the clinical diagnosis of OI was not made could not be distinguished clinically from those who were positively identified by clinical examination. The expertise of the clinician and absence of any clinical findings were not contributing factors.11 Thus, in instances when the clinical diagnosis of OI is not apparent and the only feature of NAI present is unexplained fractures, lab testing may be the best way to provide the child and family with all possible safeguards.

LABORATORY TESTING FOR OI

Laboratory diagnosis of OI depends on the determination that cultured fibroblasts make either less type I procollagen than normal, make abnormal type I procollagen molecules or the identification of a mutation in COL1A1 or COL1A2, the two genes that encode the chains of type I procollagen. Collagen screening and DNA-based testing are available at the University of Washington (www.pathology.washington.edu/clinical/collagen) and DNA-based testing is available at the Tulane University Matrix DNA Diagnostic Lab (http://www.som.tulane.edu/gene_therapy/matrix/matrix_dna_diagnostics.shtml). Test sensitivity is high for both types of tests but it is not clear if the sensitivity is additive.12,13 Mutations in COL1A1 and COL1A2 do not cause OI type V, VI or VII, which account for about 8% of all children with OI.
  22 in total

1.  Type V osteogenesis imperfecta: a new form of brittle bone disease.

Authors:  F H Glorieux; F Rauch; H Plotkin; L Ward; R Travers; P Roughley; L Lalic; D F Glorieux; F Fassier; N J Bishop
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Bruck syndrome (osteogenesis imperfecta with contractures of the large joints) caused by a recessive mutation in PLOD2.

Authors:  Russia Ha-Vinh; Yasemin Alanay; Ruud A Bank; Ana Belinda Campos-Xavier; Andreas Zankl; Andrea Superti-Furga; Luisa Bonafé
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI: a form of brittle bone disease with a mineralization defect.

Authors:  Francis H Glorieux; Leanne M Ward; Frank Rauch; Ljiljana Lalic; Peter J Roughley; Rose Travers
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Osteoprotegerin deficiency and juvenile Paget's disease.

Authors:  Michael P Whyte; Sara E Obrecht; Patrick M Finnegan; Jonathan L Jones; Michelle N Podgornik; William H McAlister; Steven Mumm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  D O Sillence; A Senn; D M Danks
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Distinct biochemical phenotypes predict clinical severity in nonlethal variants of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  R J Wenstrup; M C Willing; B J Starman; P H Byers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Identification of PLOD2 as telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase, an important enzyme in fibrosis.

Authors:  Annemarie J van der Slot; Anne-Marie Zuurmond; Alfons F J Bardoel; Cisca Wijmenga; Hans E H Pruijs; David O Sillence; Jürgen Brinckmann; David J Abraham; Carol M Black; Nicole Verzijl; Jeroen DeGroot; Roeland Hanemaaijer; Johan M TeKoppele; Tom W J Huizinga; Ruud A Bank
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Testing for osteogenesis imperfecta in cases of suspected non-accidental injury.

Authors:  A Marlowe; M G Pepin; P H Byers
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Clinical and radiological features of osteogenesis imperfecta type IVA.

Authors:  C R Paterson; S J McAllion; J W Shaw
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1987-07

10.  Osteogenesis imperfecta type VII maps to the short arm of chromosome 3.

Authors:  M Labuda; J Morissette; L M Ward; F Rauch; L Lalic; P J Roughley; F H Glorieux
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Genetic causes of fractures and subdural hematomas: fact versus fiction.

Authors:  Natasha E Shur; Maxwell L Summerlin; Bruce J McIntosh; Eglal Shalaby-Rana; Tanya S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-17

2.  Genetic analysis of adults heterozygous for ALPL mutations.

Authors:  Agnès Taillandier; Christelle Domingues; Annika Dufour; Françoise Debiais; Pascal Guggenbuhl; Christian Roux; Catherine Cormier; Bernard Cortet; Valérie Porquet-Bordes; Fabienne Coury; David Geneviève; Jean Chiesa; Thierry Colin; Elaine Fletcher; Agnès Guichet; Rose-Marie Javier; Michel Laroche; Michael Laurent; Ekkehart Lausch; Bruno LeHeup; Cédric Lukas; Georg Schwabe; Ineke van der Burgt; Christine Muti; Brigitte Simon-Bouy; Etienne Mornet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Fractures at diagnosis in infants and children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Christopher S Greeley; Marcella Donaruma-Kwoh; Melanie Vettimattam; Christine Lobo; Coco Williard; Lynnette Mazur
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 4.  Osteogenesis Imperfecta/Ehlers-Danlos Overlap Syndrome and Neuroblastoma-Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Letteria Anna Morabito; Anna Elsa Maria Allegri; Anna Paola Capra; Mario Capasso; Valeria Capra; Alberto Garaventa; Mohamad Maghnie; Silvana Briuglia; Malgorzata Gabriela Wasniewska
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Patient Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence Discussion during Genetic Counseling Sessions.

Authors:  Christina Chen; Anne Greb; Isha Kalia; Komal Bajaj; Susan Klugman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Osteogenesis Imperfecta: update on presentation and management.

Authors:  Moira S Cheung; Francis H Glorieux
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Current and emerging treatments for the management of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Elena Monti; Monica Mottes; Paolo Fraschini; Piercarlo Brunelli; Antonella Forlino; Giacomo Venturi; Francesco Doro; Silvia Perlini; Paolo Cavarzere; Franco Antoniazzi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  EMQN best practice guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Fleur S van Dijk; Peter H Byers; Raymond Dalgleish; Fransiska Malfait; Alessandra Maugeri; Marianne Rohrbach; Sofie Symoens; Erik A Sistermans; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Osteogenesis imperfecta Type VI with severe bony deformities caused by novel compound heterozygous mutations in SERPINF1.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Cho; Chang-Seok Ki; Young Bae Sohn; Su Jin Kim; Se Hyun Maeng; Dong-Kyu Jin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Mari Deguchi; Shunichiro Tsuji; Daisuke Katsura; Kyoko Kasahara; Fuminori Kimura; Takashi Murakami
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.