Literature DB >> 16778236

Günther Tulip filter retrievability multicenter study including CT follow-up: final report.

Hanno Hoppe1, Charles W Nutting, H Robert Smouse, Thomas M Vesely, Christoph Pohl, Michael A Bettmann, John A Kaufman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava (IVC) filter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a nonrandomized, single-armed, multicenter prospective investigation. Patients at temporary high risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who did not require a permanent filter were eligible. Forty-one patients received 42 Günther Tulip filters: 22 men and 19 women with a mean age of 47.7 years. Indications for filter placement included prophylaxis, PE, and DVT. Three months after filter retrieval, contrast agent-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen, jugular vein ultrasonography, and clinical follow-up were performed.
RESULTS: The filter retrieval rate was 57% (23 of 41). Günther Tulip filters were removed at a mean of 11.1 days (range, 2-14 d). The technical and clinical success rates for filter retrieval were both 100%. One placement complication and two protocol deviations occurred. These patients were excluded in terms of retrieval-related outcomes. One case of PE occurred with a filter in place, and one filter migrated to the heart. There were no acute complications caused by filter retrieval. At 3-month follow-up, there was no recurrent PE, DVT, jugular vein occlusion, or IVC stenosis or occlusion.
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, retrieval of the Günther Tulip filter was safe and without recurrent thromboembolic events or evidence of IVC or jugular vein damage at 3-month follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16778236     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.90000223689.49091.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Complications Based on Filter Type.

Authors:  Steven E Deso; Ibrahim A Idakoji; William T Kuo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Optional vena cava filters: indications, management, and results.

Authors:  Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center.

Authors:  Anthony K Guzman; Mahmoud Zahra; Scott O Trerotola; Leslie J Raffini; Maxim Itkin; Marc S Keller; Anne Marie Cahill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Introducer curving technique for the prevention of tilting of transfemoral Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; De-sheng Huang; Jing Shen; Jia-jie Tong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Günther-Tulip inferior vena cava filter removal 3334 days after placement.

Authors:  Benjamin B Lind; Hector Ferral
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases       Date:  2015-03-16

6.  Excimer Laser Sheath-Assisted Retrieval of "Closed-Cell" Design Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Authors:  Kush R Desai; Nicholas Xiao; Riad Salem; Jennifer K Karp; Robert K Ryu; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.