Literature DB >> 16777264

Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment.

B L Cullen1, F Genasi, I Symington, J Bagg, M McCreaddie, A Taylor, M Henry, S J Hutchinson, D J Goldberg.   

Abstract

A prospective survey was conducted over six months in order to estimate the proportion of reported occupational needlestick injuries sustained by National Health Service (NHS) Scotland staff that could have been prevented through either safety device introduction, improved guideline adherence, guideline revision or a combination of these. This survey involved the administration of a standard proforma to healthcare workers followed by an expert panel assessment. All acute and primary care NHS Scotland trusts, the Scottish Ambulance Service and the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service were included. Proforma and expert panel assessment data were available for 64% of injuries (952/1497) reported by healthcare staff. These injuries were all percutaneous. The expert panel concluded that: 56% of all injuries and 80% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through safety device usage, 52% of all injuries and 56% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through guideline adherence and 72% of all injuries and 88% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through either intervention. Multi-factorial analysis indicated that injuries sustained through venepuncture/injection administration were significantly more likely to be prevented through safety device usage [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.09, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.11-8.31 and adjusted OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.64-4.45, respectively], and significantly less likely to be prevented through guideline adherence (adjusted OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.60 and adjusted OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78, respectively). Injuries sustained after completing procedures were significantly more likely to be prevented through safety device usage and guideline adherence. The study's findings support the need for improvements to staff's adherence to needlestick injury guidelines and appropriate implementation of safety devices for venepuncture and injection administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16777264     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  16 in total

1.  Accidental blood exposures among emergency medicine residents and young physicians in France: a national survey.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Alice Hutin; Thomas Leredu; Patrick Plaisance; Dominique Pateron; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  H P Loveday; J A Wilson; R J Pratt; M Golsorkhi; A Tingle; A Bak; J Browne; J Prieto; M Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  A change management approach to improving safety and preventing needle stick injuries.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Aziz
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  R J Pratt; C M Pellowe; J A Wilson; H P Loveday; P J Harper; S R L J Jones; C McDougall; M H Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Findings of Phlebotomy Practices in Kenya in 2010: Need for Action.

Authors:  Daniel Kimani; Rachel Kamau; Renuka Gadde; Dejana Selenic; Stephen Maina; Lawrence Marum; Gao Hongjiang; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Marfin; Jane Mwangi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital.

Authors:  Sabine Wicker; Juliane Jung; Regina Allwinn; René Gottschalk; Holger F Rabenau
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Needlestick injuries in veterinary medicine.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Douglas C Jack
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 8.  Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.

Authors:  Viraj K Reddy; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Jos H Verbeek; Manisha Pahwa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-14

9.  Exposure rate of needlestick and sharps injuries among Australian veterinarians.

Authors:  Peter A Leggat; Derek R Smith; Richard Speare
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Reduction of needlestick injuries in healthcare personnel at a university hospital using safety devices.

Authors:  Cornelia Hoffmann; Lutz Buchholz; Paul Schnitzler
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.