Literature DB >> 16777150

Taste aversion in rats induced by forced swimming, voluntary running, forced running, and lithium chloride injection treatments.

Takahisa Masaki1, Sadahiko Nakajima.   

Abstract

The present experiment compared the strengths of taste aversion learning in rats induced by forced swimming in a water pool (5, 15, 30, or 60 min), voluntary running in an activity wheel (15, 30, 60, or 120 min), forced running in a motorized wheel (60 min at the speed of 8 m/min), optional running in the apparatus consisting of an activity wheel and a side room (120 min), and a lithium chloride (LiCl, 0.15 M LiCl at 2% of body weight) injection. The rats were given an access to saccharin solution immediately followed by one of the above treatments or simply returned back to the home cages for the control group. On the next 2 days, aversion to the saccharin solution was assessed by two-bottle choice testing between it and tap water. The following results were obtained. (1) The saccharin aversion was a positive function of exercise durations in the forced swimming and voluntary running rats, and the exercise of more than 30 min induced statistically significant saccharin aversion, compared with the control rats. (2) The forced running caused relatively strong saccharin aversion. The group of forced running rats acquired the numerically strongest saccharin aversion on average among all exercised rats. (3) The optional running treatment had little effect. (4) The LiCl injection resulted in the strongest aversion among the all treatments explored here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16777150     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

1.  Running-based pica and taste avoidance in rats.

Authors:  Sadahiko Nakajima
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Wheel running decreases palatable diet preference in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Laura Moody; Joy Liang; Pique P Choi; Timothy H Moran; Nu-Chu Liang
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-03-16

3.  Increase in carbon dioxide accelerates the performance of endurance exercise in rats.

Authors:  Takeshi Ueha; Keisuke Oe; Masahiko Miwa; Takumi Hasegawa; Akihiro Koh; Hanako Nishimoto; Sang Yang Lee; Takahiro Niikura; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda; Yoshitada Sakai
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 4.  Lithium and cognitive enhancement: leave it or take it?

Authors:  Eleftheria Tsaltas; Dimitris Kontis; Vasileios Boulougouris; George N Papadimitriou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Active training for amblyopia in adult rodents.

Authors:  Alessandro Sale; Nicoletta Berardi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 6.  Treatment of amblyopia in the adult: insights from a new rodent model of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Joyce Bonaccorsi; Nicoletta Berardi; Alessandro Sale
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  A Handful of Details to Ensure the Experimental Reproducibility on the FORCED Running Wheel in Rodents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Garrigos; Marta Martínez-Morga; Angel Toval; Yevheniy Kutsenko; Alberto Barreda; Bruno Ribeiro Do Couto; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; José Luis Ferran
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.