Literature DB >> 16777147

Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers.

C Pernet1, S Valdois, P Celsis, J-F Démonet.   

Abstract

The lateral masking effect results in lower performance on letter recognition when items are flanked by other stimuli. Using a new paradigm based on discrimination (feature analysis) and categorization (memory access) tasks, we investigated the influence of level of processing (as addressed, respectively, by these two tasks) and stimulus type (Latin letters, Korean letters and geometrical figures) on lateral masking. In addition, performance of dyslexic and non-dyslexic adult readers was compared. The non-dyslexic participants demonstrated a classical lateral masking effect with lower performance for flanked items than isolated ones. In addition, lateral masking was stronger in the categorization than in the discrimination task and was restricted to familiar items, i.e., Latin letters and geometrical figures. Dyslexic participants showed poorer performance than non-dyslexics on processing isolated items, and the pattern of decrease in performance for lateral masking was similar to non-dyslexics. However, they also showed a stronger decrease in performance in categorization and a stronger decrease related to the lateral masking for this categorization task. Our results in normal readers suggest that lateral masking relies on the interference between the target and the flankers during feature integration that may result in marked impairment of memory access (categorization task). Poorer performance in dyslexic readers may reflect impaired parafoveal/peripheral low-level processing during feature integration that may have worsened during the flanked condition due to a target selection/spatial-attentional disorder. Moreover, dyslexic subjects presented an additional categorization deficit that may relate to a specific left-hemispheric disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16777147     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists.

Authors:  Manon W Jones; Holly P Branigan; M Louise Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

2.  When all hypotheses are right: a multifocal account of dyslexia.

Authors:  Cyril Pernet; Jesper Andersson; Eraldo Paulesu; Jean Francois Demonet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Caroline Reilhac; Mélanie Jucla; Stéphanie Iannuzzi; Sylviane Valdois; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

4.  The contribution of discrete-trial naming and visual recognition to rapid automatized naming deficits of dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay.

Authors:  Filippo Gasperini; Daniela Brizzolara; Paola Cristofani; Claudia Casalini; Anna Maria Chilosi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Adults with dyslexia demonstrate large effects of crowding and detrimental effects of distractors in a visual tilt discrimination task.

Authors:  Rizan Cassim; Joel B Talcott; Elisabeth Moores
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.