Literature DB >> 16775707

Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands.

Erik Ockinger1, Henrik G Smith.   

Abstract

During the last 50 years, the distribution and abundance of many European butterfly species associated with semi-natural grasslands have declined. This may be the result of deteriorating habitat quality, but habitat loss, resulting in decreasing area and increasing isolation of remaining habitat, is also predicted to result in reduced species richness. To investigate the effects of habitat loss on species richness, we surveyed butterflies in semi-natural grasslands of similar quality and structure, but situated in landscapes of different habitat composition. Using spatially explicit habitat data, we selected one large (6-10 ha) and one small (0.5-2 ha) grassland site (pasture) in each of 24 non-overlapping 28.2 km(2) landscapes belonging to three categories differing in the proportion of the area that consisted of semi-natural grasslands. After controlling for local habitat quality, species richness was higher in grassland sites situated in landscapes consisting of a high proportion of grasslands. Species richness was also higher in larger grassland sites, and this effect was more pronounced for sedentary than for mobile species. However, the number of species for a given area did not differ between large and small grasslands. There was also a significant relationship between butterfly species richness and habitat quality in the form of vegetation height and abundance of flowers. In contrast, butterfly density was not related to landscape composition or grassland size. When species respond differently to habitat area or landscape composition this leads to effects on community structure, and nestedness analysis showed that depauperate communities were subsets of richer ones. Both grassland area and landscape composition may have contributed to this pattern, implying that small habitat fragments and landscapes with low proportions of habitat are both likely to mainly contain common generalist species. Based on these results, conservation efforts should aim at preserving landscapes with high proportions of the focal habitat.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775707     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0464-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  I Hanski; O Ovaskainen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  J A Thomas; N A Bourn; R T Clarke; K E Stewart; D J Simcox; G S Pearman; R Curtis; B Goodger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  D Kleijn; F Berendse; R Smit; N Gilissen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland.

Authors:  Miska Luoto; Seppo Rekolainen; Jyrki Aakkula; Juha Pykälä
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Thyme and isolation for the Sinai baton blue butterfly (Pseudophilotes sinaicus).

Authors:  Mike James; Francis Gilbert; Samy Zalat
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations.

Authors:  P F Donal; R E Gree; M F Heath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sources and sinks in population biology.

Authors:  P C Dias
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat.

Authors:  Wirt Atmar; Bruce D Patterson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  A null model for randomization tests of nestedness in species assemblages.

Authors:  Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies.

Authors:  Niklas Wahlberg; Teemu Klemetti; Vesa Selonen; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands.

Authors:  Juha Pöyry; Juho Paukkunen; Janne Heliölä; Mikko Kuussaari
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Birgit Meyer; Simon G Potts; Juha Pöyry; Stuart P M Roberts; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Erik Ockinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fragmentation and management of Ethiopian moist evergreen forest drive compositional shifts of insect communities visiting wild Arabica coffee flowers.

Authors:  Gezahegn Berecha; Raf Aerts; Bart Muys; Olivier Honnay
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Habitat specialisation and matrix resistance predict responses of butterfly populations to landscape features in tropical grassland-forest complexes.

Authors:  Ravi Jambhekar; Kavita Isvaran
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Multiple Assembly Rules Drive the Co-occurrence of Orthopteran and Plant Species in Grasslands: Combining Network, Functional and Phylogenetic Approaches.

Authors:  Bertrand Fournier; Arnaud Mouly; François Gillet
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Fauna of nocturnal moth species collected in a semi-natural grassland at Kanpu-zan in northern Japan.

Authors:  Masaru Kamikura; Yuzu Sakata
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-08-02

7.  Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation.

Authors:  Jacqueline Loos; Ine Dorresteijn; Jan Hanspach; Pascal Fust; László Rakosy; Joern Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lynda Donaldson; Robert J Wilson; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.549

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.