Jong Yong Abdiel Foo1, Chu Sing Lim. 1. Biomedical Engineering Research Centre, Nanyang Technological University, 6th Storey, XFrontiers Block, 50 Nanyang Drive, Research Techno Plaza, Singapore, 637553, Singapore. jong@ntu.edu.sg
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Monitoring arterial distensibility changes is important to understand the cardiovascular status of patient. Pulse transit time (PTT), which is an inverse equivalent of pulse wave velocity (PWV), has shown its potential in such studies. However, its methodological approach in using an electrocardiogram and a peripheral photoplethysmography (PPG) is limited due to the inclusion of pre-ejection period (PEP) in its computation. Previous studies have suggested the using the transit time difference between two peripheral measuring sites (PTT-D) instead. However, it requires two medical instruments and may not be efficient in terms of equipment utility, especially in prolonged clinical studies. METHODS: Postural changes are known to cause complex haemodynamics adaptation and thereby affecting transit time measurements. A customised dual-channel PPG system based on discrete electronic devices was constructed to evaluate against conventional peripheral-based PTT. 10 healthy adults (7 male; mean age 27.0 yr) were recruited to assess the differences observed in PTT and PTT-D during two postural change test activities. RESULTS: PTT-D derived from the customised PPG system registered 43.3+/- 5.6 ms and - 31.1+/- 3.8 ms relative changes for the two regulated activities while conventional PTT recorded 43.6+/- 10.3 ms and -31.0+/-m 6.5 ms respectively. The former may have similar results but have significantly lower variance (< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings herein suggest that PTT-D derived from the customised PPG system shows potential. It can be used as an alternative to conventional peripheral-based PTT and possibly as a direct assessment of arterial distensibility or PWV variations as it does not include PEP in its time-related computations.
OBJECTIVES: Monitoring arterial distensibility changes is important to understand the cardiovascular status of patient. Pulse transit time (PTT), which is an inverse equivalent of pulse wave velocity (PWV), has shown its potential in such studies. However, its methodological approach in using an electrocardiogram and a peripheral photoplethysmography (PPG) is limited due to the inclusion of pre-ejection period (PEP) in its computation. Previous studies have suggested the using the transit time difference between two peripheral measuring sites (PTT-D) instead. However, it requires two medical instruments and may not be efficient in terms of equipment utility, especially in prolonged clinical studies. METHODS: Postural changes are known to cause complex haemodynamics adaptation and thereby affecting transit time measurements. A customised dual-channel PPG system based on discrete electronic devices was constructed to evaluate against conventional peripheral-based PTT. 10 healthy adults (7 male; mean age 27.0 yr) were recruited to assess the differences observed in PTT and PTT-D during two postural change test activities. RESULTS: PTT-D derived from the customised PPG system registered 43.3+/- 5.6 ms and - 31.1+/- 3.8 ms relative changes for the two regulated activities while conventional PTT recorded 43.6+/- 10.3 ms and -31.0+/-m 6.5 ms respectively. The former may have similar results but have significantly lower variance (< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings herein suggest that PTT-D derived from the customised PPG system shows potential. It can be used as an alternative to conventional peripheral-based PTT and possibly as a direct assessment of arterial distensibility or PWV variations as it does not include PEP in its time-related computations.
Authors: Jong Yong A Foo; Stephen J Wilson; Carolyn Dakin; Gordon Williams; Margaret-Anne Harris; David Cooper Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Ronald M A Henry; Piet J Kostense; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Robert J Heine; Otto Kamp; Nico Westerhof; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Siqi Wang; David C Randall; Charles F Knapp; Abhijit R Patwardhan; Kevin R Nelson; Dennis G Karounos; Joyce M Evans Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Minke C Kortekaas; Marit H N van Velzen; Frank Grüne; Sjoerd P Niehof; Robert J Stolker; Frank J P M Huygen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter H Charlton; Birutė Paliakaitė; Kristjan Pilt; Martin Bachler; Serena Zanelli; Dániel Kulin; John Allen; Magid Hallab; Elisabetta Bianchini; Christopher C Mayer; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Verena Dittrich; Bernhard Hametner; Dave Veerasingam; Dejan Žikić; Vaidotas Marozas Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.733