Literature DB >> 16775646

Alimentary tract mucositis in cancer patients: impact of terminology and assessment on research and clinical practice.

Douglas E Peterson1, Dorothy M Keefe, Ronald D Hutchins, Mark M Schubert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE: The field of terminology and assessment of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury caused by high-dose cancer therapies in cancer patients has undergone important evolution in recent years. The advances are important for several clinical and research reasons. These reasons include improved patient management and design and conduct of clinical trials based on molecularly targeted therapies. For several decades leading up to the 1980s, terminology was characterized by varying use of "mucositis" and "stomatitis" to describe oral mucosal inflammatory changes and ulceration caused by cancer treatments. In addition, oral mucositis was viewed principally as an epithelial event and one that likely did not intersect with causative mechanisms associated with gastrointestinal mucositis. The term "stomatitis" was directed to oral toxicities and seemed to isolate these conditions from parallel events occurring throughout the alimentary tract and potentially other tissues as well. These perspectives and varying use of these terms resulted in several dilemmas, including (1) difficulty in accurately reporting incidence and severity of oral mucositis and, (2) an under-appreciation of potential significance of alimentary tract mucosal toxicity relative to overall course of therapy, patient quality of life, and in some cases, survivorship. These and related components of the model relative to mucositis have undergone strategic shifts over the past 15 years. A 1989 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference targeted oral mucositis research as one of the key areas for investigation relative to causation, clinical impact, and potential links with other complications in cancer patients. Research in this area over the past 15 years has evolved such that oral and gastrointestinal mucositis are now appropriately framed as a continuum of pathobiologic changes over time, with clinical impact that may well contribute to overall symptom clustering in selected patient cohorts.
OBJECTIVES: This paper will review history, current status, and new research directions associated with terminology and assessment of mucosal injury in cancer patients in the context described above.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775646     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0057-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  22 in total

Review 1.  Occurrence of symptom clusters.

Authors:  Marylin J Dodd; Christine Miaskowski; Kathryn A Lee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Assessment and measurement of oral mucositis.

Authors:  June Eilers; Joel B Epstein
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.315

3.  Monitoring myeloablative therapy-induced small bowel toxicity by serum citrulline concentration: a comparison with sugar permeability tests.

Authors:  Ludy C H W Lutgens; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Nicolaas E P Deutz; J Peter Donnelly; Philippe Lambin; Ben E de Pauw
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Symptom clusters: concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing.

Authors:  Hee-Ju Kim; Deborah B McGuire; Lorraine Tulman; Andrea M Barsevick
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Cytotoxic chemotherapy upregulates pro-apoptotic Bax and Bak in the small intestine of rats and humans.

Authors:  Joanne M Bowen; Rachel J Gibson; Dorothy M Keefe; Adrian G Cummins
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.306

6.  Chemotherapy for cancer causes apoptosis that precedes hypoplasia in crypts of the small intestine in humans.

Authors:  D M Keefe; J Brealey; G J Goland; A G Cummins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis.

Authors:  Edward B Rubenstein; Douglas E Peterson; Mark Schubert; Dorothy Keefe; Deborah McGuire; Joel Epstein; Linda S Elting; Philip C Fox; Catherine Cooksley; Stephen T Sonis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Symptom clusters: the new frontier in symptom management research.

Authors:  Christine Miaskowski; Marylin Dodd; Kathryn Lee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal mucositis: a new biological model.

Authors:  Dorothy M K Keefe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Chemoradiotherapy toxicity during bone marrow transplantation: time course and variation in pain and nausea.

Authors:  M K Chapko; K L Syrjala; L Schilter; C Cummings; K M Sullivan
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mucositis guidelines: what have they achieved, and where to from here?

Authors:  Dorothy M K Keefe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucositis: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  D E Peterson; R-J Bensadoun; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  The MASCC/ISOO Mucositis Guidelines Update: introduction to the first set of articles.

Authors:  Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Deborah B McGuire; Janet S Fulton; Jumin Park; Carlton G Brown; M Elvira P Correa; June Eilers; Sharon Elad; Faith Gibson; Loree K Oberle-Edwards; Joanne Bowen; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Developing evidence-based guidelines for management of alimentary mucositis: process and pitfalls.

Authors:  Dorothy M Keefe; Douglas E Peterson; Mark M Schubert
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The nature of small intestinal mucositis: a video-capsule endoscopy study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; John Dervenoulas; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Spiros D Ladas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Selecting a comparison group for 5-year oral and pharyngeal cancer survivors: two methods.

Authors:  Henrietta L Logan; Scott L Tomar; Myron Chang; Glenn E Turner; William M Mendenhall; Charles E Riggs
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Biomarkers and non-invasive tests for gastrointestinal mucositis.

Authors:  N S S Kuiken; E H H M Rings; N M A Blijlevens; Wim J E Tissing
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.