PURPOSE: A new method to estimate hemoglobin mass (Hbmass) requires capillary blood and rebreathing a carbon-monoxide (CO) bolus for 2 min. We hypothesized that incomplete circulatory mixing of CO could confound this method, so we compared capillary with venous blood to determine whether sampling site altered the percentage of carboxyhemoglobin (%HbCO) and the reliability and accuracy of the "2-min Hbmass." The conventional 20-min CO-rebreathing procedure was used as the Hbmass criterion. METHODS: In the first experiment (N=12), both fingertip capillary and antecubital venous blood were sampled 4 and 6 min after commencing 2 min of CO-rebreathing. Within 8 d, these subjects completed two 2-min and one 20-min CO-rebreathing periods. For the latter, capillary and venous blood were collected simultaneously after two 10-min periods of rebreathing. In a second experiment (N=6), both capillary and venous blood were sampled 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 min after commencing 2 min of CO-rebreathing. A third experiment (N=6) evaluated the reliability of a modified 2-min CO-rebreathing test with capillary blood sampled at minutes 8 and 10. RESULTS: Typical error (TE) for the first two 2-min tests was 1.1% (90% confidence limits 0.9-1.8%), but the average Hbmass from 2-min capillary blood was 4.8% lower than from venous blood for the 20-min procedure. In the second experiment, peak venous %HbCO occurred at minute 6, and the difference between capillary and venous values was minimal (mean+/-SD; 0.08+/-0.07, 0.01+/-0.09) at minutes 8 and 10. TE for the third experiment was 1.2% (0.8-2.5%). CONCLUSION: A modified 2-min CO-rebreathing procedure using capillary or venous blood sampled 8 and 10 min after starting CO-rebreathing allows complete circulatory mixing and provides an accurate and reliable estimate of Hbmass.
PURPOSE: A new method to estimate hemoglobin mass (Hbmass) requires capillary blood and rebreathing a carbon-monoxide (CO) bolus for 2 min. We hypothesized that incomplete circulatory mixing of CO could confound this method, so we compared capillary with venous blood to determine whether sampling site altered the percentage of carboxyhemoglobin (%HbCO) and the reliability and accuracy of the "2-min Hbmass." The conventional 20-min CO-rebreathing procedure was used as the Hbmass criterion. METHODS: In the first experiment (N=12), both fingertip capillary and antecubital venous blood were sampled 4 and 6 min after commencing 2 min of CO-rebreathing. Within 8 d, these subjects completed two 2-min and one 20-min CO-rebreathing periods. For the latter, capillary and venous blood were collected simultaneously after two 10-min periods of rebreathing. In a second experiment (N=6), both capillary and venous blood were sampled 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 min after commencing 2 min of CO-rebreathing. A third experiment (N=6) evaluated the reliability of a modified 2-min CO-rebreathing test with capillary blood sampled at minutes 8 and 10. RESULTS: Typical error (TE) for the first two 2-min tests was 1.1% (90% confidence limits 0.9-1.8%), but the average Hbmass from 2-min capillary blood was 4.8% lower than from venous blood for the 20-min procedure. In the second experiment, peak venous %HbCO occurred at minute 6, and the difference between capillary and venous values was minimal (mean+/-SD; 0.08+/-0.07, 0.01+/-0.09) at minutes 8 and 10. TE for the third experiment was 1.2% (0.8-2.5%). CONCLUSION: A modified 2-min CO-rebreathing procedure using capillary or venous blood sampled 8 and 10 min after starting CO-rebreathing allows complete circulatory mixing and provides an accurate and reliable estimate of Hbmass.
Authors: Jeffrey L Hastings; Felix Krainski; Peter G Snell; Eric L Pacini; Manish Jain; Paul S Bhella; Shigeki Shibata; Qi Fu; M Dean Palmer; Benjamin D Levine Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-02-16
Authors: N B Wachsmuth; C Völzke; N Prommer; A Schmidt-Trucksäss; F Frese; O Spahl; A Eastwood; J Stray-Gundersen; W Schmidt Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Erin J Howden; Cara East; Justin S Lawley; Abigail S L Stickford; Myrthe Verhees; Qi Fu; Benjamin D Levine Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Yoshiyuki Okada; Sara S Jarvis; Stuart A Best; Jeffrey G Edwards; Joseph M Hendrix; Beverley Adams-Huet; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Benjamin D Levine; Qi Fu Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Yoshiyuki Okada; Sara S Jarvis; Stuart A Best; Tiffany B Bivens; Beverley Adams-Huet; Benjamin D Levine; Qi Fu Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 5.182