Literature DB >> 16775074

Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane.

H Guan1, K M Wittenberg, K H Ominski, D O Krause.   

Abstract

Use of ionophores in cattle diets has been proposed as a strategy for mitigation of enteric CH4 emissions. Short- and long-term effects of feeding a single ionophore (monensin) or rotation of 2 ionophores (monensin and lasalocid) on enteric CH4 emissions were evaluated in 36 Angus yearling steers (328 +/- 24.9 kg of BW) over a 16-wk period. Steers were randomly assigned to 6 dietary treatments of 6 steers each. The 6 diets were low-concentrate without ionophore supplementation, low-concentrate with monensin supplementation, low-concentrate with a 2-wk rotation of monensin and lasalocid supplementation, high-concentrate without ionophore supplementation, high-concentrate with monensin supplementation, and high-concentrate with a 2-wk rotation of monensin and lasalocid supplementation. Daily enteric CH4 emissions, as measured using the SF(6) tracer gas technique, ranged from 54.7 to 369.3 L/steer daily. Supplementing ionophores decreased (P < 0.05) enteric CH4 emissions, expressed as liters per kilogram of DMI or percentage of GE intake, by 30% for the first 2 wk and by 27% for the first 4 wk, for cattle receiving the high-concentrate and low-concentrate diets, respectively. Cattle fed a rotation of ionophores did not (P > 0.05) exhibit a greater decrease and did not (P > 0.05) have a longer period of depressed enteric CH4 emissions compared with cattle receiving monensin only. Ionophore supplementation did not (P > 0.05) alter total ruminal fluid VFA concentration; however, the acetate:propionate ratio and ammonia-N concentration in ruminal fluid were decreased (P < 0.001) from the time that ionophores were introduced to the time they were removed from the diets. Both monensin and the rotation of monensin and lasalocid decreased (P < 0.001) total ciliate protozoal populations by 82.5% in the first 2 wk and by 76.8% in the first 4 wk during which they were supplemented in the high-concentrate and low-concentrate diets, respectively. Original ciliate protozoal populations were restored by the fourth and sixth week of supplementation when cattle were fed the high- or low-concentrate diets, respectively. No significant change was observed thereafter. These data suggest that the effects of ionophores on enteric CH(4) production are related to ciliate protozoal populations and that ciliate protozoal populations can adapt to the ionophores present in either low- or high-concentrate diets. Rotation of monensin and lasalocid did not (P > 0.05) prevent ciliate protozoal adaptation to ionophores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775074     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  29 in total

1.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production.

Authors:  Kristi M Cammack; Kathleen J Austin; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant; Hannah C Cunningham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effect of nitrate and monensin on in vitro ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  M Capelari; W Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The effect of encapsulated nitrate and monensin on ruminal fermentation using a semi-continuous culture system.

Authors:  Matheus Capelari; Kristen A Johnson; Brooke Latack; Jolene Roth; Wendy Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Inclusion of quebracho tannin extract in a high-roughage cattle diet alters digestibility, nitrogen balance, and energy partitioning.

Authors:  Aaron B Norris; Whitney L Crossland; Luis O Tedeschi; Jamie L Foster; James P Muir; William E Pinchak; Mozart A Fonseca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Performance of beef heifers supplemented with sodium lasalocid.

Authors:  Everton Dezordi Sartori; Leonardo Canali Canellas; Gabriel Ribas Pereira; Fernanda Gomes Moojen; Helena Robatini Carvalho; Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  The combined effects of supplementing monensin and 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emissions, growth rate, and feed conversion efficiency in beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets.

Authors:  Diwakar Vyas; Aklilu W Alemu; Sean M McGinn; Stephane M Duval; Maik Kindermann; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 9.  Benefits and risks of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals.

Authors:  Haihong Hao; Guyue Cheng; Zahid Iqbal; Xiaohui Ai; Hafiz I Hussain; Lingli Huang; Menghong Dai; Yulian Wang; Zhenli Liu; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effects of Cellulase Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility, Energy Utilization and Methane Emission by Boer Crossbred Goats.

Authors:  Lizhi Wang; Bai Xue
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.