Literature DB >> 1677379

Kinetics of DNA double-strand break repair throughout the cell cycle as assayed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis in CHO cells.

L Metzger1, G Iliakis.   

Abstract

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) was measured in exponentially growing, plateau-phase and synchronized G1, G1/S, early S, mid-S, late S, G2 + M and mitotic CHO cells. Cells were exposed to 50 Gy X-rays and allowed to repair (up to 4 h) in suspension at 37 degrees C. The dsb rejoining was measured by means of asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis (AFIGE), a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis technique. The fraction of DNA-associated [14C]thymidine activity released from the plug (FAR) during electrophoresis was used as a parameter to determine the number of dsb present in the DNA. The assay had been previously calibrated using 125I-decay and its sensitivity in detecting dsb throughout the cell cycle established. Biphasic kinetics of dsb rejoining with a fast and a slow component were obtained throughout the cell cycle, including mitosis, as well as in the various stages of growth. Repair kinetics were described mathematically as the sum of two exponential functions. The repair half-times calculated for the fast component by least-square fitting to the data were in the range of 7-14 min, with the shorter values reached in mid-S and late S and the longer ones during G1 and mitosis. The repair half-times of the slow component were in the range between 60 and 90 min and did not show consistent fluctuations throughout the cell cycle. The fraction of dsb repaired by the slow component ranged from 18% to 37% and did not show consistent variation throughout the cell cycle either. These results suggest that the state of chromatin condensation has only a limited impact on the ability of the cells to rejoin dsb, and indicate that the cell cycle-dependent fluctuations in radiosensitivity cannot be explained by alterations in the rate of rejoining of dsb. The repair half-times of the slow component of dsb rejoining were similar to the half-times of rejoining of chromosome breaks as visualized by the technique of premature chromosome condensation, suggesting a cause-effect relationship between rejoining of this subject of dsb and rejoining of chromosome breaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1677379     DOI: 10.1080/09553009114551201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  37 in total

1.  Differential proliferation dependence of alpha and beta damage in X-irradiated Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  D Bartkowiak; W Nothdurft; E M Röttinger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Enhanced fidelity for rejoining radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in the G2 phase of Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Ines Krüger; Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Modifying the function of DNA repair nanomachines for therapeutic benefit.

Authors:  William S Dynan; Yoshihiko Takeda; Shuyi Li
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest.

Authors:  L C Huang; K C Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision?

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Cell cycle-dependent regulation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  A Nilsson; F Sirzén; R Lewensohn; N Wang; S Skog
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 8.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy: Progress and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Richard A Morgan; David Gray; Anastasia Lomova; Donald B Kohn
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Asymmetric fusion between protoplasts of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and gamma-irradiated protoplasts of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): the effects of gamma irradiation.

Authors:  H C Schoenmakers; J J van der Meulen-Muisers; M Koornneef
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-02

10.  Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.