Literature DB >> 16773633

Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in malignant ovarian tumors and in ovarian tumors with low malignant potential.

Andrew Wiley1, Dionyssios Katsaros, Haigang Chen, Irene A Rigault de la Longrais, Alicia Beeghly, Manuela Puopolo, Rakesh Singal, Yan Zhang, Agyenim Amoako, Daniel Zelterman, Herbert Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methylation-mediated suppression of detoxification, DNA repair, and tumor suppressor genes has been implicated in cancer development and progression. Studies also have indicated that concordant methylation of multiple genes (methylator phenotypes), rather than a single gene, may predict cancer prognosis. The current study was designed to determine whether a methylator phenotype exists in ovarian cancer, whether methylation frequencies differ between malignant ovarian tumors and ovarian tumors with low malignant potential (LMP or borderline), and whether methylation of multiple genes affects patient survival.
METHODS: The current study included 234 consecutively diagnosed patients with either LMP (n = 19 patients) or malignant (n = 215 patients) ovarian tumors. DNA samples were extracted from fresh frozen tissues and were analyzed for methylation in the promoter region of 6 genes (p16, breast cancer 1 [BRCA1], insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 [IGFBP-3], glutathione S-transferase pi 1 [GSTP1], estrogen receptor-alpha [ER-alpha], and human MutL homologue 1 [hMLH1]) by using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis.
RESULTS: The frequencies of methylation in malignant tumors and LMP tumors were 0% and 0% for GSTP1, respectively; 9% and 0% for hMLH1, respectively; 21% and 5% for BRCA1, respectively; 42% and 21% for p16, respectively; 44% and 26% for IGFBP-3, respectively; and 57% and 42% for ER-alpha, respectively. A methylator phenotype was not detected, but a calculated methylation index (MI) that was based on the total number of genes methylated in each tumor was associated with ovarian cancer risk and progression. A higher MI was associated with malignant tumors (odds ratio, 10.11; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-85.75) and disease progression (hazards ratio, 6.53; 95% CI, 1.39-30.65).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a methylator phenotype was not identified, the current results suggested that methylation of multiple genes may play an important role in ovarian cancer development and progression and may have clinical implications in prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16773633     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

1.  Low expression of IGFBP-3 predicts poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Li-Ru He; Rui Zhang; Mu-Yan Cai; Yi-Ji Liao; Dong Qian; Mian Xi; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie; Meng-Zhong Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain of the United States of America.

Authors:  Megan A Murphy; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  DNA methylation: its role in cancer development and therapy.

Authors:  Carla Kurkjian; Shivaani Kummar; Anthony J Murgo
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Epigenetic determinants of ovarian clear cell carcinoma biology.

Authors:  Ken Yamaguchi; Zhiqing Huang; Noriomi Matsumura; Masaki Mandai; Takako Okamoto; Tsukasa Baba; Ikuo Konishi; Andrew Berchuck; Susan K Murphy
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Functional modulation of IGF-binding protein-3 expression in melanoma.

Authors:  Altaf A Dar; Shahana Majid; Mehdi Nosrati; David de Semir; Scot Federman; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Translational application of epigenetic alterations: ovarian cancer as a model.

Authors:  Marie E Maradeo; Paul Cairns
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 7.  Prognostic significance of several biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Linjuan Xu; Jing Cai; Qiang Yang; Hui Ding; Liying Wu; Tao Li; Zehua Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Messenger RNA expression and methylation of candidate tumor-suppressor genes and risk of ovarian cancer-a case-control analysis.

Authors:  Jiaze An; Qingyi Wei; Zhensheng Liu; Karen H Lu; Xi Cheng; Gordon B Mills; Li-E Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2010

9.  Differential methylation profile of ovarian cancer in tissues and plasma.

Authors:  Anatoliy Melnikov; Denise Scholtens; Andrew Godwin; Victor Levenson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Promoter methylation of IGFBP-3 and p53 expression in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  Pao-Ling Torng; Ching-Wei Lin; Michael Wy Chan; Hui-Wen Yang; Su-Cheng Huang; Chin-Tarng Lin
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.