Literature DB >> 16773332

Body size patterns in Drosophila inhabiting a mesocosm: interactive effects of spatial variation in temperature and abundance.

Marié Warren1, Melodie A McGeoch, Sue W Nicolson, Steven L Chown.   

Abstract

Body size is a major component of fitness. However, the relative contributions of different factors to optimal size, and the determinants of spatial and temporal variation in size, have not been fully established empirically. Here, we use a mesocosm of a Drosophilidae assemblage inhabiting decaying nectarines to investigate the influence of spatial variation in temperature on adult body size in Drosophila simulans Sturtevant. Two treatments were established; one in the sun where developing larvae were exposed to high temperatures and the other in the shade where temperature conditions were milder. The simple developmental effects of temperature differences (i.e. larger flies are likely to emerge from cooler environments), or the simple effects of stressful temperatures (i.e. high temperatures yield wing abnormalities and smaller flies), were overridden by interactive effects between temperature and larval density. Emergences were lower in the sun than shade, probably as a result of temperature-induced mortality. However, flies attained the same final sizes in the shade and sun. In addition, abnormally winged flies were clustered in the shaded treatments. In the shade treatments, where emergences were higher than in the sun, stressful conditions as a result of high larval density likely resulted in wing abnormalities and small size. Consequently, there was little spatial variation in size across the mesocosm, but substantial spatial variation in abundance. Under natural conditions both mortality and non-lethal effects of temperature and/or crowding are likely to play a role in the evolution of body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16773332     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0434-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  31 in total

1.  Size and seasonal temperature in free-ranging Drosophila subobscura.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Therm Biol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 2.902

2.  Geographic variation in competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A C James; L Partridge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Environmental and genetic variations of wing size, cell size and cell division rate, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Delcour; F A Lints
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  COMPLEX TRADE-OFFS AND THE EVOLUTION OF STARVATION RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Terence J F Chu; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BODY SIZE AND CELL SIZE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RESPONSE TO TEMPERATURE.

Authors:  Linda Partridge; Brian Barrie; Kevin Fowler; Vernon French
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  AN INTERACTION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE AND GENETIC VARIATION FOR BODY SIZE FOR THE FITNESS OF ADULT FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Jennie McCabe; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  On the developmental theory of ageing. II. The effect of developmental temperature on longevity in relation to adult body size in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  B J Zwaan; R Bijlsma; R F Hoekstra
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Gibbs; A K Chippindale; M R Rose
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Temperature modulates epidermal cell size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R B.R. Azevedo; V French; L Partridge
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.354

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dietary protein content affects evolution for body size, body fat and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; Johannes Overgaard; Volker Loeschcke; David Mayntz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Temporal dynamics of arthropods on six tree species in dry woodlands on the Caribbean Island of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  William Beltrán; Joseph M Wunderle
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.