Literature DB >> 16772907

Comparisons of resource costs and success rates between immediate and delayed breast reconstruction using DIEP or SIEA flaps under a well-controlled clinical trial.

Ming-Huei Cheng1, Jeng-Yee Lin, Betul Gozel Ulusal, Fu-Chan Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year many patients diagnosed with breast cancer are subjected to mastectomy. Some of them choose to undergo breast reconstruction to restore their body image. Immediate or delayed reconstruction is possible, depending on medical, financial, and emotional considerations. High success rate and cost-effectiveness are two important factors that may guide decision making in the management plan. The objective of this study was to compare the resource costs and success rates of immediate and delayed breast reconstructions using either deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The resource cost is referred to as the cost of operation and hospitalization.
METHODS: From September of 2000 through August of 2001, 42 patients underwent immediate (n = 21) or delayed (n = 21) unilateral breast reconstruction using either a DIEP (n = 30) or SIEA (n = 12) flap by one surgeon.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in resource costs, success, and complication rates between DIEP and SIEA flaps in both the immediate and delayed breast reconstruction groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Using either a DIEP or SIEA flap as the autologous tissue, delayed breast reconstruction is as cost-effective as immediate reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16772907     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218286.64522.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

2.  Quantitative assessment of perfusion and vascular compromise in perforator flaps using a near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging system.

Authors:  Aya Matsui; Bernard T Lee; Joshua H Winer; Rita G Laurence; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Geraldine Darmanin; Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

4.  A Meta-analysis of Clinical, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost of DIEP versus Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Max Prokopenko; Max Greenfield; Oliver Smith; Andrea L Pusic; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-28

5.  Microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction in the midst of a pandemic: A single-unit COVID-19 experience.

Authors:  Weiguang Ho; Guido Köhler; Richard M Haywood; Anais Rosich-Medina; Dhalia Masud
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Complications of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  André S Alves; Vincent Tan; Matteo Scampa; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Carlo M Oranges
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Early Postoperative Complications From National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Closer Examination of Timing and Technique of Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani; Erin Cordeiro; Anne C O'Neill; Stefan O P Hofer; Tulin D Cil; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.763

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.