Literature DB >> 16772745

A cost effective method of identifying and recruiting persons over 80 free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment.

Neill R Graff-Radford1, Tanis J Ferman, John A Lucas, Heather K Johnson, Francine C Parfitt, Michael G Heckman, Murray Todd, Carl Sadowsky, Dawn E Epstein, Julia E Crook.   

Abstract

For observational or prevention studies, accurately identifying by mail and telephone cognitively normal elderly volunteers would be cost effective. We describe how to recruit cognitively normal sib-pairs over age 80 using commercially available lists by age and ZIP code. We mailed an Institutional Review Board-approved letter to 24,366 persons over 85 around Jacksonville, FL, and received approximately 3,000 postcard replies with approximately 500 answering 3 screening statements affirmatively. Of these, we recruited 128 persons who underwent both in-person and telephone evaluations, the latter using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Blinded to the TICS-m and CDR data, clinicians made a consensus diagnosis for each participant, 120 were normal and 8 had mild cognitive impairment. With CDR, 119 patients (93%) screened as normal, and of these 115 (97%) were confirmed as normal with the consensus diagnosis. A TICS-m score cut-off of <29 resulted in a similar proportion of normals in the screened sample (97% or 103/106); however, 13 normal volunteers would have been excluded because they scored <29 on the TICS-m. Supplementing the sample, we recruited 12 age-matched cases having consensus diagnosis of dementia (n=2) or mild cognitive impairment (n=10). A CDR>0 correctly identified 12/12, whereas the TICS-m <29 correctly identified 7/12. Hearing loss present in 50% did not influence TICS-m or CDR performance. Using stringent entry criteria and the telephone CDR, this method accurately identified normal elderly persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16772745     DOI: 10.1097/01.wad.0000213813.35424.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  18 in total

1.  Adverse family experiences and flourishing amongst children ages 6-17 years: 2011/12 National Survey of Children's Health.

Authors:  Tammie Y Kwong; Donald K Hayes
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Accelerated clinical decline in well-educated patients with frontotemporal lobar degenerations.

Authors:  Robert Perneczky; Corina Pohl; Susanne Bornschein; Hans Förstl; Alexander Kurz; Janine Diehl-Schmid
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Validation of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and intact elders.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; William H Adams
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

4.  Correcting for demographic variables on the modified telephone interview for cognitive status.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; David Shprecher; Irene Litvan; Adam Gerstenecker; Benjamin Mast
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.105

5.  Telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS) screening for clinical trials of physical activity and cognitive training: the seniors health and activity research program pilot (SHARP-P) study.

Authors:  Mark A Espeland; Stephen R Rapp; Jeff A Katula; Lee Ann Andrews; Deborah Felton; Sarah A Gaussoin; Dale Dagenbach; Claudine Legault; Janine M Jennings; Kaycee M Sink
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  CLEC3B p.S106G Mutant in a Caucasian Population of Successful Neurological Aging.

Authors:  Ana Kolicheski; Ronald L Walton; Alexandra I Soto-Beasley; Michael G Heckman; Ryan J Uitti; Francine Parfitt; Michelle R Graff-Radford; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Neill R Graff-Radford; Owen A Ross
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Cognitive outcomes of patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jennifer E Fugate; Samuel A Moore; David S Knopman; Daniel O Claassen; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Roger D White; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Validation of a cognitive assessment battery administered over the telephone.

Authors:  Stephen R Rapp; Claudine Legault; Mark A Espeland; Susan M Resnick; Patricia E Hogan; Laura H Coker; Maggie Dailey; Sally A Shumaker
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Validation of the telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia.

Authors:  David S Knopman; Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; V Shane Pankratz; Teresa J H Christianson; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Demographic corrections for the modified telephone interview for cognitive status.

Authors:  Kathryn Dennett; Danielle Tometich; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.