Literature DB >> 16772314

Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing.

Corentin Jacques1, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

Scalp event-related potential (ERP) studies in humans indicate that face processes taking place between 130 and 170 ms after stimulus onset at posterior sites (N170) are strongly reduced when another face stimulus is processed concurrently or has been presented shortly before for a prolonged period. These observations suggest that neural representations of individual faces compete in the occipitotemporal cortex as early as 130 ms. Here, we tested the respective role of spatial attention and sensory competition in accounting for the amplitude reduction of the N170 during concurrent face stimulation. ERPs time locked to a lateralized face stimulus were recorded while subjects were fixating either a face or a controlled scrambled-face stimulus (context factor) and were engaged in either a high- or a low-attentional load task at fixation (task factor). The N170 amplitude to the lateralized face stimulus was reduced both when the central stimulus was a face compared with a scrambled face and when the attentional load at fixation was high. However, these effects of context and task factors were largely additive. Most importantly, spatial attention modulated visual processes as early as 80 ms after stimulus onset, whereas sensory competition effects started at about 130 ms. These results provide strong evidence that the N170 in response to faces is modulated by spatial attention, and also that spatial attention and sensory competition do not reflect the same mechanisms of early selection of visual information in the extrastriate cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16772314     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  16 in total

1.  Is the rapid adaptation paradigm too rapid? Implications for face and object processing.

Authors:  Dan Nemrodov; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Selective attention modulates face-specific induced gamma oscillations recorded from ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Electrophysiological responses to violations of expectation from eye gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Jason Tipples; Pat Johnston; Angela Mayes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Situation-based social anxiety enhances the neural processing of faces: evidence from an intergroup context.

Authors:  Renana H Ofan; Nava Rubin; David M Amodio
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Ignored faces produce figural face aftereffects.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Madeline Judge; Yan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset.

Authors:  Benjamin Dering; Clara D Martin; Sancho Moro; Alan J Pegna; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Sensory competition in the face processing areas of the human brain.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimal eye-gaze fixation position for face-related neural responses.

Authors:  Younes Zerouali; Jean-Marc Lina; Boutheina Jemel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.