Literature DB >> 16771956

Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Neena S Abraham1, J Travis Gossey, Jessica A Davila, Sarah Al-Oudat, Jennifer K Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate utilization of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy among patients with stage II or III colon cancer and stage II/III rectal or rectosigmoid cancer, as recommended by current national guidelines.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston, TX) used 1999-2003 administrative data to identify patients with a diagnostic code for colorectal cancer. Medical charts were then abstracted to identify an incident cohort with stage II or III cancer. Outcome of interest was receipt of recommended therapy defined as surgery only (stage II colon) or surgery with adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy (stage III colon or stage II/III rectal/rectosigmoid cancer). Potential determinants of receipt of recommended therapy were analyzed using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among 197 incident cases diagnosed or treated, mean age of patients was 66 yr (SD, 11 yr), 64% were Caucasian, and 98.5% were men. A gastroenterologist diagnosed 72.5% tumors including 62 stage II colon, 62 stage III colon, and 73 stage II/III rectal cancers. Referral to oncology occurred in 76% of stage II colon, 92% of stage III colon, and 99% of rectal cancers. 87% of stage II and 71% of stage III colon cancer patients received recommended therapy, compared to only 42.5% of rectal cancer patients. Predictors of receipt of recommended therapy among rectal cancers included being married (OR, 5.3; 95% CI: 1.6-17.1), presentation at tumor board (OR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.2-11.2), or age<65 yr (OR, 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3-9.3). When patient's comorbidity and physician's decision-making process were considered in the assessment of the outcome, only presentation at tumor board remained predictive of receipt of recommended therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Most colon cancer patients at a major VA medical center receive recommended therapy. Among rectal cancer patients, those presented at tumor board are most likely to receive recommended therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16771956     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00545.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  24 in total

1.  Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy use among veterans with colon cancer: insights from a California study.

Authors:  Denise M Hynes; Elizabeth Tarlov; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Ruth Perrin; Qiuying Zhang; Thomas Weichle; M Rosario Ferreira; Todd Lee; Al B Benson; Nirmala Bhoopalam; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Is there a role for clinical practice guidelines in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings? A descriptive study of knowledge transfer between research and practice.

Authors:  Xanthoula Kostaras; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Emily Malcolm; Jacob C Easaw; Wilson Roa; Neil A Hagen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring obstacles and facilitators to their implementation.

Authors:  Nicole J Look Hong; Anna R Gagliardi; Susan E Bronskill; Lawrence F Paszat; Frances C Wright
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Katherine L Kahn; Stacy W Gray; Aileen B Chen; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Cetuximab Combined With Induction Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine, Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: SWOG 0713.

Authors:  Cynthia Gail Leichman; Shannon L McDonough; Stephen R Smalley; Kevin G Billingsley; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Matthew A Beldner; Aram F Hezel; Mario R Velasco; Katherine A Guthrie; Charles D Blanke; Howard S Hochster
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Lawrence N Shulman; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Prereferral head and neck cancer treatment: compliance with national comprehensive cancer network treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Amy C Hessel; Dianna B Roberts; Yunxia Z Guo; F Christopher Holsinger; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Adel K El-Naggar; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-12

Review 8.  Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Valerie M Nelson; Al B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Federico Venuta; Daniele Diso; Ilaria Onorati; Marco Anile; Sara Mantovani; Erino A Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Concordance with clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I-III colon cancer: experience in 2 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Debrah A Wirtzfeld; Lynn Mikula; Robert Gryfe; Pietro Ravani; Elizabeth L Dicks; Pat Parfrey; Steve Gallinger; William G Pollett
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.