Literature DB >> 16771656

On the analysis and interpretation of inhomogeneous quadratic forms as receptive fields.

Pietro Berkes1, Laurenz Wiskott.   

Abstract

In this letter, we introduce some mathematical and numerical tools to analyze and interpret inhomogeneous quadratic forms. The resulting characterization is in some aspects similar to that given by experimental studies of cortical cells, making it particularly suitable for application to second-order approximations and theoretical models of physiological receptive fields. We first discuss two ways of analyzing a quadratic form by visualizing the coefficients of its quadratic and linear term directly and by considering the eigenvectors of its quadratic term. We then present an algorithm to compute the optimal excitatory and inhibitory stimuli--those that maximize and minimize the considered quadratic form, respectively, given a fixed energy constraint. The analysis of the optimal stimuli is completed by considering their invariances, which are the transformations to which the quadratic form is most insensitive, and by introducing a test to determine which of these are statistically significant. Next we propose a way to measure the relative contribution of the quadratic and linear term to the total output of the quadratic form. Furthermore, we derive simpler versions of the above techniques in the special case of a quadratic form without linear term. In the final part of the letter, we show that for each quadratic form, it is possible to build an equivalent two-layer neural network, which is compatible with (but more general than) related networks used in some recent articles and with the energy model of complex cells. We show that the neural network is unique only up to an arbitrary orthogonal transformation of the excitatory and inhibitory subunits in the first layer.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16771656     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.8.1868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  7 in total

1.  Excitatory and suppressive receptive field subunits in awake monkey primary visual cortex (V1).

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Feng Han; Mu-Ming Poo; Yang Dan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Kamal Sen; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Current progress and open challenges for applying deep learning across the biosciences.

Authors:  Nicolae Sapoval; Amirali Aghazadeh; Michael G Nute; Dinler A Antunes; Advait Balaji; Richard Baraniuk; C J Barberan; Ruth Dannenfelser; Chen Dun; Mohammadamin Edrisi; R A Leo Elworth; Bryce Kille; Anastasios Kyrillidis; Luay Nakhleh; Cameron R Wolfe; Zhi Yan; Vicky Yao; Todd J Treangen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Sustained firing of model central auditory neurons yields a discriminative spectro-temporal representation for natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael A Carlin; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Adaptive stimulus optimization for sensory systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Slow feature analysis on retinal waves leads to V1 complex cells.

Authors:  Sven Dähne; Niko Wilbert; Laurenz Wiskott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine.

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger; Georg Langs; Helmut Denk; Kurt Zatloukal; Heimo Müller
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov       Date:  2019-04-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.