Literature DB >> 16770368

[Patient satisfaction with assessment of headache by specialist consultation].

Svein Ivar Bekkelund1, Rolf Salvesen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Headache is a common cause for referral of patients from a general practitioner to a neurologist. We have investigated patient satisfaction with neurological consultations for headache in Northern Norway.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We sent a postal questionnaire to all patients referred for headache from general practice to departments of neurology in Northern Norway from 1998 to 2000.
RESULTS: Of 1403 patients, 942 (67%) responded to all relevant items in the questionnaire.160 of the patients were seen in Vefsn, 191 in Bodø and 591 in Tromsø. About 54% (510/942) of the patients were satisfied with the specialist consultation. Patients examined at the department in Bodø were significantly more satisfied (62 %) than patients examined in Tromsø (54%) or Vefsn (44%). Patients investigated in Tromsø reported improvement after treatment significantly more often than those seen in Vefsn. There was no difference in satisfaction between the three locations in the subgroup of patients with migraine. Patients who received a diagnosis or were given some kind of therapy were more content than others.
INTERPRETATION: Almost half of the patients were not satisfied with the consultation. The degree of satisfaction varied between departments. More investigations are needed to clarify which patients with headache will benefit from a specialist consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16770368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen        ISSN: 0029-2001


  2 in total

1.  A survey of community members' perceptions of medical errors in Oman.

Authors:  Ahmed S Al-Mandhari; Mohammed A Al-Shafaee; Mohammed H Al-Azri; Ibrahim S Al-Zakwani; Mushtaq Khan; Ahmed M Al-Waily; Syed Rizvi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Patient experience studies in the circumpolar region: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christine Ingemann; Nathaniel Fox Hansen; Nanna Lund Hansen; Kennedy Jensen; Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen; Susan Chatwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.