Literature DB >> 16770194

LeFort III advancement with and without osteogenesis distraction.

Giorgio Iannetti1, Teresa Fadda, Alessandro Agrillo, Giulio Poladas, G Iannetti, Fabio Filiaci.   

Abstract

The LeFort III osteotomy is the surgical treatment performed in patients with mid-facial retrusions in craniofacial dysostoses such as Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer syndromes, etc. The first authors to report the accomplishment of this osteotomy were Gillies and Harrison in 1951, this technique was then resumed and improved by Tessier in 1967, who made five different variants mainly regarding the typology of the osteotomy concerning the lateral wall of the orbit. Recently, distraction techniques have been applied to the upper mid-face which foresees a gradual advancement of the mid-face through the osteogenetic distraction procedure. The purpose of this retrospective clinical outcome study is to evaluate and compare the two different surgical techniques through the experience acquired during the treatment of 15 cases of craniofacial dysostoses from 1990-2005, and through international literature. The standard surgery technique was performed in 5 of these patients, whereas the osteogenetic distraction technique was performed in the remaining 10. All patients were studied preoperatively through the acquisition of photographic images, cephalometric analysis of the skull, and the study on plaster models of the occlusion of the dental arches. The instrumental exams required before surgery are the following: telecranium X-rays in two projections, orthopanoramic X-rays, CT. The results of this study indicate that the osteodistraction technique represents the choice treatment in severe retrusions of the mid-face while the traditional surgical technique remains indicated in adult patients that are in need of moderate advancements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16770194     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200605000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  7 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Cranio-maxillofacial, orthodontic and dental treatment in three patients with Apert syndrome.

Authors:  S Carpentier; J Schoenaers; C Carels; A Verdonck
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-03-19

3.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Comparison of Midface Advancement by External and Internal Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  S M Balaji; Preetha Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

5.  The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew A Heggie; Ricky Kumar; Jocelyn M Shand
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01

6.  Monoblock craniofacial internal distraction in a child with Pfeiffer syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Jaiho Chung; Dong Ha Park; Soo Han Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Evaluation of cephalometric points in midface bone lengthening with the use of a rigid external device in syndromic craniosynostosis patients.

Authors:  Daniel Santos Corrêa Lima; Nivaldo Alonso; Paulo Roberto Pelúcio Câmara; Dov Charles Goldenberg
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.