Literature DB >> 16769494

Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.

Guilherme Janson1, João Tadeu Amim Graciano, José Fernando Castanha Henriques, Marcos Roberto de Freitas, Arnaldo Pinzan, Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the initial occlusal and cephalometric severity of Class II Division 1 malocclusion patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
METHODS: Dental study models and cephalograms of 62 patients were selected. Those in group 1 (n = 42) were treated without extractions, and those in group 2 (n = 20) were treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions. Grainger's treatment priority index (TPI) was used to assess the final and the initial occlusal status of each subject. Variables such as overjet and overbite were also evaluated. Independent t tests were used to compare the occlusal variables at the posttreatment stage, the occlusal and cephalometric variables at the pretreatment stage, and the improvement in TPI values between the groups.
RESULTS: Patients treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions had greater initial occlusal TPI values, overjets, cephalometric apical base anteroposterior discrepancies, maxillary incisor protrusions, and anteroposterior molar discrepancies than those treated without extractions.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with more severe anteroposterior discrepancies, an extraction plan provides more effective treatment with less need for patient compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16769494     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  4 in total

1.  Outcomes of different Class II treatments : Comparisons using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System.

Authors:  Hatice Akinci Cansunar; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  In vitro evaluation of an alternative method to bond molar tubes.

Authors:  Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino; Arnaldo Pinzan; Júlio de Araújo Gurgel; Fausto Silva Bramante; Luciana Maio Pinzan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Renata Sathler; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Marcelo Zanda; Arnaldo Pinzan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Efficiency of class I and class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Alexandre Nakamura; Sérgio Estelita Barros; Roberto Bombonatti; Kelly Chiqueto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.