OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a binational intensive care database. SETTING: One hundred thirty-eight intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: A structure was developed to enable ICUs to submit data for central and local analysis. Reports were developed to allow comparison with similar ICU types and against published mortality prediction models. The database was evaluated according to (a) the criteria of the Directory of Clinical Databases (DoCDat) and (b) a proposed framework for data quality assurance in medical registries. RESULTS: Between January 1987 and December 2003, 444,147 data sets were collected from 121 (72.5%) of 167 Australian and 10 (37.0%) of 27 New Zealand ICUs. Data sets from more than 60000 ICU admissions were submitted in 2003. Overall hospital mortality was 14.5%. The mean quality level achieved according to DoCDat criteria was high as was performance against a proposed framework for data quality. The provision of no-cost software has been vitally important to the success of the database. CONCLUSION: A high-quality ICU database has successfully been implemented in Australia and New Zealand and is now used as a routine quality assurance and peer review tool. Similar developments may be both possible and desirable in other countries.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a binational intensive care database. SETTING: One hundred thirty-eight intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: A structure was developed to enable ICUs to submit data for central and local analysis. Reports were developed to allow comparison with similar ICU types and against published mortality prediction models. The database was evaluated according to (a) the criteria of the Directory of Clinical Databases (DoCDat) and (b) a proposed framework for data quality assurance in medical registries. RESULTS: Between January 1987 and December 2003, 444,147 data sets were collected from 121 (72.5%) of 167 Australian and 10 (37.0%) of 27 New Zealand ICUs. Data sets from more than 60000 ICU admissions were submitted in 2003. Overall hospital mortality was 14.5%. The mean quality level achieved according to DoCDat criteria was high as was performance against a proposed framework for data quality. The provision of no-cost software has been vitally important to the success of the database. CONCLUSION: A high-quality ICU database has successfully been implemented in Australia and New Zealand and is now used as a routine quality assurance and peer review tool. Similar developments may be both possible and desirable in other countries.
Authors: Glenn Eastwood; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; Gopal Taori; David Pilcher; Paul Young; Richard Beasley Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Paul Jeffrey Young; Manoj Saxena; Richard Beasley; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; Simon Finfer; David Harrison; John Myburgh; Kathryn Rowan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Dashiell Gantner; Kj Farley; Michael Bailey; Sue Huckson; Peter Hicks; David Pilcher Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Steve A R Webb; Anthony Delaney; Carol George; David Pilcher; Graeme K Hart; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Gopal Taori; Kwok M Ho; Carol George; Rinaldo Bellomo; Steven A R Webb; Graeme K Hart; Michael J Bailey Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael J Jacka; Moritoki Egi; Graeme K Hart; Carol George Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 9.097