UNLABELLED: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is a method for detecting haemoperitoneum in trauma patients on initial assessment in the Emergency Department. The aim of this paper is to present an Australian trauma centre's experience with FAST as a tool to screen for intraabdominal free fluid in patient's sustaining blunt truncal trauma. METHOD: Over a 63-month period, FAST scans were prospectively studied and compared with findings from a gold-standard investigation, either computed tomography (CT) or laparotomy. RESULTS: 463 FAST results were collected prospectively from 463 patients. 53 scans were excluded due to lack of a corresponding confirmatory gold-standard test. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for FAST in detecting free fluid were 78%, 97%, 91%, 93%, respectively. Analysis of the credentialed operators demonstrated an improvement in accuracy (sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 94%). These findings are comparable with documented international experience. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the use of non-radiologist performed FAST in the detection of free fluid is safe and accurate within an Australian Trauma Centre.
UNLABELLED: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is a method for detecting haemoperitoneum in traumapatients on initial assessment in the Emergency Department. The aim of this paper is to present an Australian trauma centre's experience with FAST as a tool to screen for intraabdominal free fluid in patient's sustaining blunt truncal trauma. METHOD: Over a 63-month period, FAST scans were prospectively studied and compared with findings from a gold-standard investigation, either computed tomography (CT) or laparotomy. RESULTS: 463 FAST results were collected prospectively from 463 patients. 53 scans were excluded due to lack of a corresponding confirmatory gold-standard test. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for FAST in detecting free fluid were 78%, 97%, 91%, 93%, respectively. Analysis of the credentialed operators demonstrated an improvement in accuracy (sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 94%). These findings are comparable with documented international experience. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the use of non-radiologist performed FAST in the detection of free fluid is safe and accurate within an Australian Trauma Centre.
Authors: Rachael A Callcut; Michael W Cripps; Mary F Nelson; Amanda S Conroy; Bryce B R Robinson; Mitchell J Cohen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Christopher Partyka; Andrew Coggins; Jimmy Bliss; Brian Burns; Michele Fiorentino; Pierre Goorkiz; Matthew Miller Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2021-11-24
Authors: Dirk Stengel; Johannes Leisterer; Paula Ferrada; Axel Ekkernkamp; Sven Mutze; Alexander Hoenning Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-12