Literature DB >> 16768879

Do Canadian prenatal records support evidence-based practices to reduce maternal smoking?

Sonia Semenic1, Nancy Edwards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Maternal smoking remains the most important modifiable risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes. Integrating evidence-based screening questions and intervention guides for maternal smoking into standardized prenatal records may improve the identification and treatment of pregnant smokers. This study sought to identify and compare how prenatal records across Canadian provinces and territories currently address the issue of maternal tobacco use.
METHODS: Content analysis of prenatal record forms from 11 provinces and territories was used to identify assessment questions and intervention prompts related to maternal smoking or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Findings were evaluated in light of current best-practice recommendations for maternal smoking cessation and prevention of relapse.
RESULTS: The content of prenatal records related to maternal smoking varies widely among Canadian provinces and territories. Most of the prenatal records surveyed lacked prompts to support key practices for the effective screening and treatment of maternal tobacco dependence, such as providing multiple response options to determine whether the pregnant woman or her partner smokes, monitoring maternal smoking patterns throughout the course of pregnancy, and referring pregnant smokers to specialized resources for smoking cessation.
CONCLUSION: Simple changes to Canadian prenatal record forms may lead to improved population-wide screening and counselling of pregnant smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16768879     DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32156-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  2 in total

1.  Decision-making and evidence use during the process of prenatal record review in Canada: a multiphase qualitative study.

Authors:  Sonia Semenic; Nancy Edwards; Shahirose Premji; Joanne Olson; Beverly Williams; Phyllis Montgomery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level.

Authors:  Nancy Edwards; Sonia Semenic; Shahirose Premji; Phyllis Montgomery; Beverly Williams; Joanne Olson; Omaima Mansi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.