PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to augment healing of surgical incisions and hematomas after high-energy trauma. MATERIALS: This study is a prospective randomized evaluation of NPWT in trauma patients, randomizing patients with draining hematomas to either a pressure dressing (group A) or a VAC (group B). Additionally, patients with calcaneus, pilon, and high-energy tibial plateau fractures were randomized to either a standard postoperative dressing or a VAC over the sutures. RESULTS: There were 44 patients randomized into the hematoma study. Group A drained a mean of 3.1 days, compared with only 1.6 days for group B. This difference was significant (p=0.03). The infection rate for group A was 16%, compared with 8% in group B. An additional 44 patients have been randomized into the fracture study. Again, a significant difference (p=0.02) was present when comparing drainage in group A (4.8 days) and group B (1.8 days). No significant difference was present at current enrollment for infection or wound breakdown. DISCUSSION: NPWT has been used on many complex traumatic wounds. Potential mechanisms of action include angiogenesis, increased blood flow, and decreased interstitial fluid. This ongoing randomized study has demonstrated decreased drainage and improved wound healing following both hematomas and severe fractures.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to augment healing of surgical incisions and hematomas after high-energy trauma. MATERIALS: This study is a prospective randomized evaluation of NPWT in traumapatients, randomizing patients with draining hematomas to either a pressure dressing (group A) or a VAC (group B). Additionally, patients with calcaneus, pilon, and high-energy tibial plateau fractures were randomized to either a standard postoperative dressing or a VAC over the sutures. RESULTS: There were 44 patients randomized into the hematoma study. Group A drained a mean of 3.1 days, compared with only 1.6 days for group B. This difference was significant (p=0.03). The infection rate for group A was 16%, compared with 8% in group B. An additional 44 patients have been randomized into the fracture study. Again, a significant difference (p=0.02) was present when comparing drainage in group A (4.8 days) and group B (1.8 days). No significant difference was present at current enrollment for infection or wound breakdown. DISCUSSION: NPWT has been used on many complex traumatic wounds. Potential mechanisms of action include angiogenesis, increased blood flow, and decreased interstitial fluid. This ongoing randomized study has demonstrated decreased drainage and improved wound healing following both hematomas and severe fractures.
Authors: W G P Eardley; K V Brown; T J Bonner; A D Green; J C Clasper Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Adrian Dragu; Stefan Schnürer; Frank Unglaub; Maya B Wolf; Justus P Beier; Ulrich Kneser; Raymund E Horch Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Broadus Zane Atkins; Jean K Tetterton; Rebecca P Petersen; Kista Hurley; Walter G Wolfe Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Onnen Grauhan; Artashes Navasardyan; Baris Tutkun; Felix Hennig; Peter Müller; Manfred Hummel; Roland Hetzer Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Allen Gabriel; Jaimie Shores; Brent Bernstein; Jean de Leon; Ravi Kamepalli; Tom Wolvos; Mona M Baharestani; Subhas Gupta Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Erik Hansen; Joel B Durinka; James A Costanzo; Matthew S Austin; Gregory K Deirmengian Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.176