Literature DB >> 16766931

Intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures using an expandable nail: early results of 54 acute tibial shaft fractures.

Ely L Steinberg1, David S Geller, Shahan V Yacoubian, Nadav Shasha, Shmuel Dekel, Dean G Lorich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and present our experience using the expandable nail system for the treatment of acute tibial shaft fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Two level-1 trauma centers-University teaching hospitals.
METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients were treated by this nail system for acute tibial shaft fracture. Two nail diameters were used, 8.5 mm and 10 mm. Operation, hospitalization and healing times, reaming versus nonreaming, isolated versus multiple injuries, and reoperations were recorded and analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: Follow-up was obtained either until fracture healing or for a minimum of 1 year with an average of 14 months (12 to 24). All fractures healed in an average time of 72 days (21 to 204). The average healing times for patients treated with 8.5-mm and 10-mm nails were 77.2 days (27 to 204) and 63.4 days (21 to 121), respectively. Average operative time was 103 minutes (40 to 185) if reamed and 56 minutes (30 to 80) if unreamed. Average healing times were 65.4 days (21 to 190) if reamed and 79.5 days (42 to 204) if unreamed. There were 11 complications (20.4%) related to the nailing: 3 deep infections, 2 superficial infections, 2 bone shortenings of 1 cm secondary to nail protrusion in the knee, 1 compartment syndrome, 1 fracture propagation, 1 distal malalignment, and 1 delayed union. Hardware was removed in 6 patients (3 infections, 2 patients' request and 1 protrusion into the knee), and 1 additional patient underwent exchange nailing due to a delayed union.
CONCLUSIONS: The expandable nail offers the theoretical advantages of improved load sharing and rotational control without the need for interlocking screws. This study demonstrates satisfactory healing and alignment for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures using this device. However, caution must be exercised when using this nail in cases of significant comminution and in cases where the fracture pattern involves the more proximal or distal aspect of the tibial shaft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16766931     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200605000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

Review 1.  Expandable intramedullary nails for humeral fractures: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  David M Rose; Toby O Smith; Dominic Nielsen; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-02-02

2.  Are inflatable nails an alternative to interlocked nails in tibial fractures?

Authors:  Jesper Blomquist; Odd J Lundberg; Nils R Gjerdet; Anders Mølster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The first description in the literature, of a complication during the extraction of a retrograde expandable intra-medullary nail in three patients.

Authors:  K Tilkeridis; T Tzatzairis; M Tryfonidis; D S Elliot; R B Simonis
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-13

4.  Expandable self-locking nail in the management of closed diaphyseal fractures of femur and tibia.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Himanshu Kataria; Tankeswar Boruah; Satya R Patra; Aashish Chaudhry; Saurabh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Expandable intramedullary nails in lower limb trauma: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  David M Rose; Toby O Smith; Dominic Nielsen; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2013-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.