MOTIVATION: Following the advent of microarray technology in recent years, the challenge for biologists is to identify genes of interest from the thousands of genetic expression levels measured in each microarray experiment. In many cases the aim is to identify pattern in the data series generated by successive microarray measurements. RESULTS: Here we introduce a new method of detecting pattern in microarray data series which is independent of the nature of this pattern. Our approach provides a measure of the algorithmic compressibility of each data series. A series which is significantly compressible is much more likely to result from simple underlying mechanisms than series which are incompressible. Accordingly, the gene associated with a compressible series is more likely to be biologically significant. We test our method on microarray time series of yeast cell cycle and show that it blindly selects genes exhibiting the expected cyclic behaviour as well as detecting other forms of pattern. Our results successfully predict two independent non-microarray experimental studies.
MOTIVATION: Following the advent of microarray technology in recent years, the challenge for biologists is to identify genes of interest from the thousands of genetic expression levels measured in each microarray experiment. In many cases the aim is to identify pattern in the data series generated by successive microarray measurements. RESULTS: Here we introduce a new method of detecting pattern in microarray data series which is independent of the nature of this pattern. Our approach provides a measure of the algorithmic compressibility of each data series. A series which is significantly compressible is much more likely to result from simple underlying mechanisms than series which are incompressible. Accordingly, the gene associated with a compressible series is more likely to be biologically significant. We test our method on microarray time series of yeast cell cycle and show that it blindly selects genes exhibiting the expected cyclic behaviour as well as detecting other forms of pattern. Our results successfully predict two independent non-microarray experimental studies.
Authors: Miguel A Moreno-Risueno; Jaimie M Van Norman; Antonio Moreno; Jingyuan Zhang; Sebastian E Ahnert; Philip N Benfey Journal: Science Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Alan L Hutchison; Mark Maienschein-Cline; Andrew H Chiang; S M Ali Tabei; Herman Gudjonson; Neil Bahroos; Ravi Allada; Aaron R Dinner Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Nicholas Paul Gauthier; Malene Erup Larsen; Rasmus Wernersson; Ulrik de Lichtenberg; Lars Juhl Jensen; Søren Brunak; Thomas Skøt Jensen Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Mary-Lee Dequéant; Sebastian Ahnert; Herbert Edelsbrunner; Thomas M A Fink; Earl F Glynn; Gaye Hattem; Andrzej Kudlicki; Yuriy Mileyko; Jason Morton; Arcady R Mushegian; Lior Pachter; Maga Rowicka; Anne Shiu; Bernd Sturmfels; Olivier Pourquié Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 3.240