BACKGROUND: Previous studies showing that smaller low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size is associated with greater atherosclerotic risk did not adequately control for small and large LDL particle correlation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the association of lipoproteins measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in apparently healthy individuals (N = 5538, 38% White, 28% African American, 22% Hispanic, 12% Chinese). Small and large LDL particle concentrations (LDL-p) were inversely correlated (r = /-0.63, P < 0.0001). Controlling for risk factors but not for LDL subclass correlation, LDL size and small LDL-p separately were associated with IMT (-20.9 and 31.7 microm change in IMT per 1-S.D., respectively, both P < 0.001), but large LDL-p was not (4.9 microm, P = 0.27). When LDL subclasses were included in the same model, large and small LDL-p were both associated with IMT (36.6 and 52.2 microm higher IMT per 1-S.D., respectively, both P < 0.001; 17.7 and 11.6 microm per 100 nmol/L, respectively). LDL size was not significant after accounting for LDL subclasses and risk factors (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Both LDL subclasses were significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, with small LDL confounding the association of large LDL with atherosclerosis. Future studies of LDL size should account for the strong inverse correlation of LDL subclasses.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies showing that smaller low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size is associated with greater atherosclerotic risk did not adequately control for small and large LDL particle correlation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the association of lipoproteins measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in apparently healthy individuals (N = 5538, 38% White, 28% African American, 22% Hispanic, 12% Chinese). Small and large LDL particle concentrations (LDL-p) were inversely correlated (r = /-0.63, P < 0.0001). Controlling for risk factors but not for LDL subclass correlation, LDL size and small LDL-p separately were associated with IMT (-20.9 and 31.7 microm change in IMT per 1-S.D., respectively, both P < 0.001), but large LDL-p was not (4.9 microm, P = 0.27). When LDL subclasses were included in the same model, large and small LDL-p were both associated with IMT (36.6 and 52.2 microm higher IMT per 1-S.D., respectively, both P < 0.001; 17.7 and 11.6 microm per 100 nmol/L, respectively). LDL size was not significant after accounting for LDL subclasses and risk factors (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Both LDL subclasses were significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, with small LDL confounding the association of large LDL with atherosclerosis. Future studies of LDL size should account for the strong inverse correlation of LDL subclasses.
Authors: Edward K Duran; Aaron W Aday; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker; Aruna D Pradhan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Griffith Bell; Samia Mora; Philip Greenland; Michael Tsai; Ed Gill; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Pamela Ouyang; Dhananjay Vaidya; Adrian Dobs; Sherita Hill Golden; Moyses Szklo; Susan R Heckbert; Peter Kopp; Susan M Gapstur Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2008-09-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ron C Hoogeveen; John W Gaubatz; Wensheng Sun; Rhiannon C Dodge; Jacy R Crosby; Jennifer Jiang; David Couper; Salim S Virani; Sekar Kathiresan; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Monique A Ford; Joseph P McConnell; Shahar Lavi; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Stacy J Hartman; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ying Zhang; Alicia J Jenkins; Arpita Basu; Julie A Stoner; Maria F Lopes-Virella; Richard L Klein; Timothy J Lyons Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 5.922