Literature DB >> 16765794

Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.

So-Hyang Chung1, In Sik Lee, Young Ghee Lee, Hyung Keun Lee, Eung Kweon Kim, Geunyoung Yoon, Kyoung Yul Seo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in 70 eyes (38 patients) that had wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those in 70 eyes (40 patients) that had wavefront-guided laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Myongdong Bal-geun sesang Eye Clinic, and Seran Eye Center, Seoul, Korea.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 140 consecutive eyes of 78 patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK or LASEK according to the patient's choice after each procedure had been thoroughly explained. The patients were followed for 6 months. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, and wavefront aberrations were measured at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in postoperative BCVA, UCVA, and manifest refraction between groups. The mean root-mean-square wavefront error of HOAs for a scotopic pupil in the wavefront-guided LASIK group was significantly smaller than that in the wavefront-guided LASEK group at 1 month. Analyzing individual Zernike coefficients, the spherical aberration and second coma were significantly smaller in the wavefront-guided LASIK group than in the wavefront-guided LASEK group at 1 month. This difference in HOAs between groups disappeared at 3 and 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The HOAs in the scotopic condition were not different between the wavefront-guided LASIK and LASEK groups beginning 3 months after surgery. However, the HOAs in the LASIK and LASEK groups had a different time course, especially in the case of spherical aberration. This finding suggests that postoperative changes in aberration contribute to the final outcome of wavefront-guided ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765794     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of higher-order aberration and optical quality after Epi-LASIK and LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Yang; Yan Wang; Kanxing Zhao; Lihua Fang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Effects of advanced surface ablations and intralase femtosecond LASIK on higher order aberrations and visual acuity outcome.

Authors:  Tahra Almahmoud; Rejean Munger; W Bruce Jackson
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-30

4.  Method for expressing clinical and statistical significance of ocular and corneal wave front error aberrations.

Authors:  Michael K Smolek
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Higher-order aberrations after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Michelle H Hu; Alfred J White; Evan S Loft; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction using the WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser system.

Authors:  Esmeralda Costa; Nuno Franqueira; Andreia M Rosa; Cristina Tavares; Maria J Quadrado; Conceição Lobo; Joaquim N Murta
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Changes in spherical aberration after various corneal surface ablation techniques.

Authors:  Hyun Seok Ahn; Jae Lim Chung; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 8.  Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy versus Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li-Quan Zhao; Huang Zhu; Liang-Mao Li
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Valleh Sajjadi; Mohammad Ghoreishi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2015

Review 10.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kuryan; Anjum Cheema; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.