Literature DB >> 16765791

Analysis of results related to good and bad outcomes of Intacs implantation for keratoconus correction.

Jorge L Alió1, Mohamed H Shabayek, José I Belda, Pablo Correas, Elio Diez Feijoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors influencing good and poor outcomes after intracorneal ring segment implantation to correct keratoconus.
SETTING: Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante (Vissum Corporation), University of Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain.
METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of the visual outcome, 25 eyes of 21 patients were implanted after intracorneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology) as a method to correct keratoconus. Outcomes were evaluated 6 months after implantation based on the visual results. Group A comprised 20 eyes that gained 3 lines or more of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) to correct keratoconus, and Group B comprised 5 eyes that lost 1 line of BSCVA.
RESULTS: In Group A, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.43 (20/50) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.82 (20/20) (P< or =.0001). In Group B, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.36 (20/63) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.24 (20/80) (P< or =.02). The preoperative mean sphere power was 3.90 diopters (D) greater in Group B than in Group A (P< or =.007); the mean spherical equivalent was 4.36 D greater (P< or =.007), and the mean K-reading was 6.91 D greater (P< or =.001). The postoperative reduction in spherical dioptric power was 2.11 D (P< or =.027) and the mean spherical equivalent, 2.81 D (P< or =.003), significant only in Group A. The reduction in mean central K-readings was 4.30 D (P< or =.0001) in Group A and 6.19 D (P< or =.014) in Group B. The correlation of the preoperative mean K value to the postoperative BSCVA was significant at the .01 level by the Pearson test (-0.67). In Group A, all eyes (100%) had a mean K-reading < or =53 D. In Group B, 4 eyes (80%) had a mean K-reading > or =55 D.
CONCLUSION: Intacs provided better results in visual acuity and corneal topography quality and significantly reduced the spherical equivalent in eyes with keratoconus with relatively low mean K values (< or =53 D) and a relatively low spherical equivalent. In advanced keratoconus (mean K-reading > or =55 D), poor results can be anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765791     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  26 in total

1.  Implantable collamer lenses after intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus.

Authors:  Alejandro Navas; Guillermo Tapia-Herrera; Martha Jaimes; Enrique O Graue-Hernández; Arturo Gomez-Bastar; Tito Ramirez-Luquín; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Treatment of moderate to severe keratoconus with 6-mm Intacs SK.

Authors:  Sasan Niknam; Mehrdad Shamshiri; Seyed Sahabaldin Shahrzad; Abbas Alipour; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Mohammad Taher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Influence of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation on corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ebru Gorgun; Raciha Beril Kucumen; Nursal Melda Yenerel
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Keraring implantation using the Zeiss Visumax femtosecond laser in the management of patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  C L Wilde; S G Naylor; Z Varga; A Morrell; J L Ball
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Rose K contact lens fitting for keratoconus.

Authors:  Yelda Buyru Ozkurt; Tomris Sengor; Sevda Kurna; Tufan Evciman; Semih Acikgoz; Melih Haboğlu; Suat Aki
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Keratoconus: overview and update on treatment.

Authors:  Ladan Espandar; Jay Meyer
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

8.  Intrastromal corneal ring implants for corneal thinning disorders: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

9.  Evaluation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for treatment of post-LASIK ectasia patients with a mechanical implantation technique.

Authors:  Zeki Tunc; Firat Helvacioglu; Sadik Sencan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Safety and efficacy of Intacs in Indian eyes with keratoconus: an initial report.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Kannan M Narayana; Kurian Mathew; D Anand; Prerna Mhaske; Bhujang K Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.