Literature DB >> 16765703

Accommodative spasm after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Suzanna Airiani1, Richard E Braunstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a case of accommodative spasm following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
DESIGN: Observational case report.
METHODS: Ophthalmic examination including manifest and cycloplegic refraction to assist in diagnosis.
RESULTS: Two months following LASIK surgery, a 41-year-old healthy woman complained of intolerable headaches that had interfered with her daily activities. The patient sought medical consultation, and an MRI of the brain was normal. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 and 20/25 with manifest refraction of -2.25 -0.50 x 170 and plano in the right and the left eye, respectively. Cycloplegic refraction was plano in the right and +0.75 sphere in the left eye, and she was corrected to 20/20 bilaterally. After being treated with cyclopentolate 1% one drop at bedtime to each eye for approximately six weeks, the headache completely resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: Accommodative spasm should be considered in patients undergoing LASIK surgery complicated with fluctuating refraction of uncertain causes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765703     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  6 in total

1.  A new treatment option for the resistant spasm of accommodation: clear lens extraction and multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Ozgun Melike Gedar Totuk; Umit Aykan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Accommodative spasm in siblings: a unique finding.

Authors:  Robert P Rutstein
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Serial measurements of accommodation by open-field Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer in eyes with accommodative spasm.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanda; Mariko Kobayashi; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Recurrent refractive error after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis - What could be the reason?

Authors:  Radhika Natarajan; Raj S Paul
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects.

Authors:  Hidenaga Kobashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Tomoya Handa; Wakako Ando; Takushi Kawamorita; Akihito Igarashi; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Pseudomyopia: A Review.

Authors:  María García-Montero; Gema Felipe-Márquez; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Nuria Garzón
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.