Literature DB >> 16765631

SFTG international collaborative study on in vitro micronucleus test II. Using human lymphocytes.

M Gillian Clare1, Giocondo Lorenzon, Leslie C Akhurst, Daniel Marzin, Joost van Delft, Regina Montero, Alain Botta, Arma Bertens, Serena Cinelli, Véronique Thybaud, Elisabeth Lorge.   

Abstract

This study on the in vitro micronucleus assay, comprising 11 laboratories using human lymphocytes, was coordinated by an organizing committee supported by the SFTG (the French branch of the European Environmental Mutagen Society). Nine coded substances were assessed for their ability to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro, mitomycin C being used as a positive control. Cultures were exposed to the test substances for a short (early or late) time or for a long time, followed by a short or long recovery period, in the presence of cytochalasin B. Each chemical was evaluated, generally in two laboratories, using three treatment schedules at least twice. The data were assessed for acceptability, and then classified as negative, positive or equivocal. Two of seven genotoxic compounds, namely colchicine and bleomycin, clearly induced micronuclei. Reproducible results were difficult to obtain for some substances, which tended to be those acting at specific stages of the cell cycle. Cytosine arabinoside, diethylstilboestrol and 5-fluorouracil were classified as equivocal. Urethane and thiabendazole were classified as negative. The two presumed non-genotoxic compounds, mannitol and clofibrate, did not induce micronuclei. Repeat testing, exposing cells at both an early and late time after mitogenic stimulation, was needed to detect substances classified as equivocal. These results show the importance of achieving sufficient inhibition of nuclear division to avoid the possibility of missing an effect. The evaluation of micronuclei in mononucleated as well as binucleated cells was particularly useful to detect aneugens. There were no false positive results using lymphocytes, indicating a high specificity. It is concluded that the clastogenic or aneugenic potential in vitro of the substances tested was correctly identified in this study, but that refining the protocol to take into account factors such as the stages of the cell cycle exposed to the compound, or the duration of recovery would be likely to improve the sensitivity of detection using lymphocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765631     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjan Vračko; Marjan Tušar; Aneta Jezierska; Marjana Novič; Ralph Kühne; Gerrit Schüürmann
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Genotoxic potential of selected cytostatic drugs in human and zebrafish cells.

Authors:  Goran Gajski; Marko Gerić; Bojana Žegura; Matjaž Novak; Jana Nunić; Džejla Bajrektarević; Vera Garaj-Vrhovac; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The in vitro micronucleus assay using imaging flow cytometry and deep learning.

Authors:  Matthew A Rodrigues; Christine E Probst; Artiom Zayats; Bryan Davidson; Michael Riedel; Yang Li; Vidya Venkatachalam
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2021-05-18

4.  Seven benzimidazole pesticides combined at sub-threshold levels induce micronuclei in vitro.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Micronuclei induced by reverse transcriptase inhibitors in mononucleated and binucleated cells as assessed by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Eloir D Lourenço; Viviane S do Amaral; Mauricio Lehmann; Rafael R Dihl; Virginia M Schmitt; Kênya S Cunha; Maria L Reguly; Heloisa H R de Andrade
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Assessment of Chios Mastic Oil by the In Vitro Micronucleus Test on Human Lymphocytes and the In Vivo Wing Somatic Test on Drosophila.

Authors:  Dimitris Vlastos; Elena Drosopoulou; Ioanna Efthimiou; Maximos Gavriilidis; Dimitra Panagaki; Krystalenia Mpatziou; Paraskevi Kalamara; Despoina Mademtzoglou; Penelope Mavragani-Tsipidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Review on Mutagenicity Testing for Hazard Classification of Chemicals at Work: Focusing on in vivo Micronucleus Test for Allyl Chloride.

Authors:  Kyung-Taek Rim; Soo-Jin Kim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2015-06-19

8.  A mode-of-action approach for the identification of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Lya G Hernández; Jan van Benthem; George E Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  ECVAM retrospective validation of in vitro micronucleus test (MNT).

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Silvio Albertini; Thomas Hartung; Sebastian Hoffmann; Daniela Maurici; Stefan Pfuhler; Jan van Benthem; Philippe Vanparys
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Evaluation of the genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of Chios mastic water by the in vitro micronucleus test on human lymphocytes and the in vivo wing somatic test on Drosophila.

Authors:  Dimitris Vlastos; Despoina Mademtzoglou; Elena Drosopoulou; Ioanna Efthimiou; Tatiana Chartomatsidou; Christina Pandelidou; Melina Astyrakaki; Eleftheria Chalatsi; Penelope Mavragani-Tsipidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.