Literature DB >> 16765404

Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference.

Claudiu Simion1, Shinsuke Shimojo.   

Abstract

Decision making has been regarded as the last stage before action in the human information processing, certainly subsequent to sensory sampling and perceptual integration. Our latest study showed that orienting contributes to preference decision making, by integrating preferential looking and mere exposure in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice. Here, we introduce a gaze-contingent window method of stimulus presentation into our experimental paradigm, to completely block holistic stimulus processing while preserving piecemeal sampling through the gaze-contingent "peephole". This effectively zooms the visual processing in time domain, allowing us to show that orienting and decision making can interact long before the actual conscious choice. The finding also suggests that this interaction is independent of holistic properties of face stimuli and can be totally memory-driven.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765404     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  A gaze bias with coarse spatial indexing during a gambling task.

Authors:  Noha Mohsen Zommara; Muneyoshi Takahashi; Kajornvut Ounjai; Johan Lauwereyns
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Eyetracking of social preference choices reveals normal but faster processing in autism.

Authors:  Alma Gharib; Daniela Mier; Ralph Adolphs; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Heuristics and Criterion Setting during Selective Encoding in Visual Decision-Making: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Cainen Gerety; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  Reappraising abstract paintings after exposure to background information.

Authors:  Seongmin A Park; Kyongsik Yun; Jaeseung Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying instructed choice exploration of small city maps.

Authors:  Sofia Sakellaridi; Peka Christova; Vassilios N Christopoulos; Alice Vialard; John Peponis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The tell-tale look: viewing time, preferences, and prices.

Authors:  Brian C Gunia; J Keith Murnighan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Implications of Visual Attention Phenomena for Models of Preferential Choice.

Authors:  Timothy L Mullett; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-02-01

8.  The effect of gaze-contingent stimulus elimination on preference judgments.

Authors:  Masahiro Morii; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-09

9.  Eye Movements in Risky Choice.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; Frouke Hermens; William J Matthews
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2015-01-26

10.  Value-based decision making via sequential sampling with hierarchical competition and attentional modulation.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.