Literature DB >> 16765279

Enclosing a pen with a postal questionnaire can significantly increase the response rate.

Linda Sharp1, Claire Cochran, Seonaidh C Cotton, Nicola M Gray, Marie E Gallagher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is important to maximize response rates to postal questionnaires. We compared the impact of three low-cost interventions on response rates.
METHODS: A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial trial was conducted, nested within TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears). Three interventions were evaluated: (1) enclosing a TOMBOLA-branded pen with the questionnaire (as opposed to no pen); (2) sending the questionnaires by first class post (as opposed to second class); and (3) enclosing a preaddressed return envelope on which there was a second class postage stamp (rather than a freepost business-reply envelope). Nine hundred thirty women, aged 20-59 years, due to receive a TOMBOLA psychosocial questionnaire by post during June-August 2003 were randomized.
RESULTS: Enclosing a pen resulted in a statistically significant 7.0% increase in the cumulative proportion of questionnaires returned (from 61.5 to 68.5%; P = .002). The adjusted odds of response was significantly raised (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.82). Neither first class post nor providing a stamped envelope had a significant impact on response. There were no interactions between the interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Enclosing a pen with a questionnaire can significantly increase response. This low-cost strategy was effective against a background of "good practice" with regard to the administration of postal questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765279     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  14 in total

1.  Resident preparedness in discussing prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul Wheatley-Price; Christine Massey; Tony Panzarella; Frances A Shepherd; Joseph Mikhael
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: a cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial.

Authors:  Seonaidh Cotton; Linda Sharp; Claire Cochran; Nicola Gray; Maggie Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Julian Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Study on occupational allergy risks (SOLAR II) in Germany: design and methods.

Authors:  Sabine Heinrich; Astrid Peters; Jessica Kellberger; Diana Ellenberg; Jon Genuneit; Dennis Nowak; Christian Vogelberg; Erika von Mutius; Gudrun Weinmayr; Katja Radon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomized trials developed from two consensus workshops.

Authors:  Valerie Brueton; Sally P Stenning; Fiona Stevenson; Jayne Tierney; Greta Rait
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 6.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03

7.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06

8.  SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Starr; Gladys McPherson; Mark Forrest; Seonaidh C Cotton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Survey of the UK veterinary profession: common species and conditions nominated by veterinarians in practice.

Authors:  T D Nielsen; R S Dean; N J Robinson; A Massey; M L Brennan
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 10.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V C Brueton; J F Tierney; S Stenning; S Meredith; S Harding; I Nazareth; G Rait
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.