Literature DB >> 16765123

Usefulness of a novel "response score" to predict hemodynamic and clinical outcome from cardiac resynchronization therapy.

E Kevin Heist1, Cynthia Taub, Dali Fan, Daniel Arzola-Castaner, Chrisfouad R Alabiad, Vivek Y Reddy, Moussa Mansour, Theofanie Mela, Michael H Picard, Jeremy N Ruskin, Jagmeet P Singh.   

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important treatment for patients with congestive heart failure and ventricular dyssynchrony, but response to CRT is highly variable. We assessed whether a scoring system that encompasses a combination of patient selection and procedural variables would improve prediction of CRT response. Thirty-nine patients who underwent CRT with echocardiographic assessment of baseline contractility and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, intraprocedural assessment of LV lead electrical delay, and postprocedural chest radiography were included. Baseline LV dyssynchrony was measured by Doppler tissue velocity imaging as the maximum time difference between peak systolic velocity of anterior, lateral, posterior, and septal walls. The hemodynamic effect of CRT was measured by Doppler analysis of mitral regurgitation as percent change in maximal +dP/dt (DeltadP/dt) with CRT on versus off. Acute responders to CRT were defined as Deltadp/dt >or=25%. Clinical response was measured as a combined end point of hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality. A 4-point response score was generated using variables associated with DeltadP/dt and assigning 1 point for a dorsoventral LV/right ventricular interlead distance>10 cm, 1 point for a LV lead electrical delay>or=50%, 1 point for a baseline maximum +dP/dt <600 mm Hg/s, and 1 point for a maximum time difference>100 ms. In conclusion, there was a significant association between response score (0 to 4 points) and acute hemodynamic response to CRT (p<0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis associated a higher response score with improved 12-month event-free survival after CRT implantation (p=0.0019).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765123     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure predicts cardiac mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Hirohiko Suzuki; Masayuki Shimano; Yukihiko Yoshida; Yasuya Inden; Takashi Muramatsu; Yukiomi Tsuji; Naoya Tsuboi; Haruo Hirayama; Rei Shibata; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Circulating MicroRNA-30d Is Associated With Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure and Regulates Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis: A Translational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yonathan F Melman; Ravi Shah; Kirsty Danielson; Junjie Xiao; Bridget Simonson; Andreas Barth; Khalid Chakir; Gregory D Lewis; Zachary Lavender; Quynh A Truong; Andre Kleber; Ranendra Das; Anthony Rosenzweig; Yaoyu Wang; David Kass; Jagmeet P Singh; Saumya Das
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A new baseline scoring system may help to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Xuedong Shen; Chandra K Nair; Wilbert S Aronow; Mak J Holmberg; Madhu Reddy; Kishley Anand; Tom Hee; Aimin Chen; Xiang Fang; Stephanie Maciejewski; Dennis J Esterbrooks
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  The value of serum metabolomics analysis in predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Meng-Ruo Zhu; Zibire Fulati; Yang Liu; Wen-Shuo Wang; Qian Wu; Yan-Gang Su; Hai-Yan Chen; Xian-Hong Shu
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.