Literature DB >> 16765121

Gender differences of revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Jing Fang1, Michael H Alderman.   

Abstract

Women are less likely to undergo revascularization after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We assessed whether this was due to patterns of hospital admission or less frequent revascularization even when resources are available. Using New York City hospital discharge records from 1995 to 2002, we determined revascularization rates for patients who were hospitalized for AMI. Rates of admission to hospitals capable of revascularizing and revascularization use were assessed by gender. Odds ratios of admission and procedure use were determined after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and accounting for availability of revascularization in neighborhoods of residence. Of 93,978 patients with AMI (43.7% women), 27% were revascularized (32% and 20% for men and women, respectively, p <0.001). Moreover, women were less likely than men to be admitted to hospitals capable of revascularization (45% vs 52%, p <0.001) and to undergo revascularization (54% vs 60%, p <0.001) when admitted to capable hospitals. These differences were similar for residents of neighborhoods with or without revascularization services. Odds ratios for men versus women were 1.22 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.26) for admission to revascularizing hospitals and 1.28 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.34) for using revascularization among patients in revascularization hospitals. The in-hospital mortality advantage of men over women persisted after revascularization (9.6% vs 14.5%). In conclusion, less revascularization after AMI among women was associated with less frequent admission to hospitals capable of revascularization and less frequent revascularization even when admitted to performing hospitals. However, improving revascularization among women does not eliminate the gender disparity of in-hospital death after AMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765121     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

2.  Sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction: time trends from 1994 to 2003 in British Columbia.

Authors:  Tara L Sedlak; Aihua Pu; Eve Aymong; Min Gao; Nadia Khan; Hude Quan; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Acute Coronary Syndromes: Differences in Men and Women.

Authors:  Kris R Kawamoto; Melinda B Davis; Claire S Duvernoy
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Characteristics of and outcomes for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: differences between females and males.

Authors:  Nguyen Dang Thang; Björn Wilgot Karlson; Thomas Karlsson; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Access to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 30-day mortality in patients with incident STEMI: Differentials by educational level and gender over 11 years.

Authors:  Laura Cacciani; Nera Agabiti; Anna Maria Bargagli; Marina Davoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women: Are There Differences When Compared with Men?

Authors:  Usha Rao; G Louise Buchanan; Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.