Literature DB >> 16764769

[Evaluating prophylactic ligation of thoracic duct during radical resection of esophageal carcinoma].

Jian-Hua Fu1, Yi Hu, Wei-Zhao Huang, Hong Yang, Zhi-Hua Zhu, Bin Zheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic ligation of thoracic duct during the radical resection of esophageal carcinoma is usually used to prevent and treat chylothorax, but there is dispute about the effect. Its correlation to other complications and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma patients after operation has seldom been reported. The study was to evaluate its preventive effect on chylothorax and its influences on other complications and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma patients.
METHODS: Clinical data from 389 patients who underwent radical transthoracic esophagectomy from Jun. 1991 to Jun. 1996 in Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 389 patients, 171 received thoracic duct ligation (ligation group), and 218 had thoracic duct preserved (preservation group). The occurrence rates of chylothorax and other complications, and the survival rates were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The occurrence rates of chylothorax were 1.17% in ligation group and 0.46% in preservation group (P<0.001). The occurrence rates of complication were 18.2% in ligation group and 11.5% in preservation group (P=0.063). Perioperative mortalities were 1.75% in ligation group and 0.92% in preservation group (P=0.658). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 74.3%, 52.1%, 42.1%, and 29.2% in ligation group, and 74.3%, 53.2%, 43.1%, and 29.8% in preservation group (P=0.992, 0.819, 0.841, 0.902).
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic ligation of thoracic duct during esophagectomy for patients with esophageal carcinoma could not prevent chylothorax effectively, and has no obvious influence on the occurrence of other complications and survival of the patients after operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16764769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ai Zheng


  4 in total

1.  Prophylactic ligation of the opacified thoracic duct in minimally invasive esophagectomy - feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Lunkhomba Takhellambam; Thakur Deen Yadav; Hemanth Kumar; Vikas Gupta; Cherring Tandup; Ujjwal Gorsi; Vishal Sharma; Harshal Mandhavdhare; Tanvir Samra; Harjeet Singh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Cervical chylous leakage following esophagectomy that was successfully treated by intranodal lipiodol lymphangiography: a case report.

Authors:  Tatsuro Tamura; Naoshi Kubo; Akira Yamamoto; Katsunobu Sakurai; Takahiro Toyokawa; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Masakazu Yashiro; Kiyoshi Maeda; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer: An initial experience.

Authors:  Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Sumanta Dey; Sandeep Sabnis; Raghavendra Gupta; Bharath Cumar; Saravana Kumar; Ramesh Natarajan; Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Shaohua Ma; Tianshen Yan; Dandan Liu; Keyi Wang; Jingdi Wang; Jintao Song; Tong Wang; Wei He; Jie Bai; Liang Jin
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.