Literature DB >> 16764681

Morphological differences in the temporomandibular joints in asymmetrical prognathism patients.

M Kawakami1, K Yamamoto, M Inoue, T Kawakami, M Fujimoto, T Kirita.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the morphology of the temporomandibular joints (TMJ) in skeletal asymmetry with prognathism.
DESIGN: Three-group observational clinical study. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: University setting. Thirty-five patients undergoing orthognathic surgery without signs and symptoms of TMJ disorder were assigned to three groups (right deviation, n = 11; left deviation, n = 14; and non-deviation; n = 10) based on anteroposterior cephalometric analysis. OUTCOME MEASURE: Positional and morphological differences of the TMJs were evaluated using a total of 70 bilateral sagittal TMJ magnetic resonance images.
RESULTS: In both the right and left deviation groups, the TMJ on the deviated side showed a significantly steeper eminence than that on the non-deviated side (p < 0.05). The anterior joint space was narrower on the deviated side than on the non-deviated side whereas the posterior joint space did not differ markedly, indicating an anterior position of the condyle in the glenoid fossa of the TMJ on the deviated side. Disk displacement comparisons revealed no significant differences between left and right sides in the symmetry or asymmetry group.
CONCLUSION: Asymmetrical prognathism patients exhibit significant morphological differences between the right and left TMJs concerning the slope of the articular eminence, which correspond to facial asymmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16764681     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00362.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Posteroanterior cephalometric changes in subjects with temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  O C Almăşan; M Băciuţ; M Hedeşiu; S Bran; H Almăşan; G Băciuţ
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Correlation between the position of the glenoid fossa and condylar translational movement in skeletal Class III mandibular asymmetry patients.

Authors:  Lin Tun Oo; Jun J Miyamoto; Jun-Ichi Takada; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.131

3.  Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Seulgi Han; Sang Min Shin; Yong-Seok Choi; Ki Beom Kim; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Koutaro Maki; Chooryung J Chung; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Relationship between chin deviation and the position and morphology of the mandible in individuals with a unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Kyung-Seon Kim; Woo-Sung Son; Soo-Byung Park; Seong-Sik Kim; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Mandibular asymmetry: a three-dimensional quantification of bilateral condyles.

Authors:  Han Lin; Ping Zhu; Yi Lin; Shuangquan Wan; Xin Shu; Yue Xu; Youhua Zheng
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 6.  Correlations Between Mandibular Asymmetries and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nasser Alqhtani; Deema Alshammery; Nawaf AlOtaibi; Faisal AlZamil; Aljowhara Allaboon; Dana AlTuwaijri; Mohammad Abdul Baseer
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2021-07-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.