Literature DB >> 16764137

Fluoride release and uptake by various dental materials after fluoride application.

Katsushi Okuyama1, Yasuhiro Murata, Patricia N R Pereira, Patricia Almeida Miguez, Hisanori Komatsu, Hidehiko Sano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the amounts of fluoride released from fluoride-containing materials before and after daily topical fluoride applications.
METHODS: A conventional glass-ionomer: Fuji Ionomer Type II (F2); a resin-modified glass-ionomer: Fuji Ionomer Type II LC (LC); two "giomer" materials: Reactmer Paste (RP), and Beautifil (BT); a fluoride-containing resin composite: Unifil F (UF); and a non-fluoride resin composite: AP-X (AP) were used in this study. Each material was filled into a plastic mold, with inner diameter of 9 mm wide x 3 mm high. The specimens were stored in vials filled with 8 ml distilled deionized water for 24 hours at 37 degrees C. The specimens were then removed from the vials and the amount of fluoride released into the water, over the 24-hour period, was measured. The amount of fluoride released was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ion-analyzer. These procedures were repeated at Days 2, 3, 7, 14, and 21. After 21 days, all specimens were exposed to 1000 ppm F NaF solution for 5 minutes once a day. This procedure and measurement of fluoride release were continued for 14 days. After 14 days, the specimens were placed in water for 7 days and fluoride release was measured. The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test (P< 0.05).
RESULTS: At the 22nd day (1 day after starting fluoride exposure), there was no difference between the F2 and RP, though there were significant differences between the two GICs and the groups BT and UF. After that day, there were significant differences between GIC and the group RP, BT and UF. All materials showed a decrease in fluoride release 7 days after end of the fluoride immersion period. F2, LC, and UF showed no significant difference of fluoride release between Day 21 and 1 day after the end of the fluoride immersion period (P= 0.310: F2 and UF, 0.548: LC). On the other hand, RP and BT revealed lower fluoride release 1 day after the end of the fluoride immersion period as compared to Day 21 (P= 0.075: RP, 1.000: BT). For AP, fluoride release was not detected after the fluoride immersion period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16764137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  5 in total

1.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ruchika Bansal; Tajinder Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer.

Authors:  Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab; Ian Meyers
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2009

3.  A Deep Morphological Characterization and Comparison of Different Dental Restorative Materials.

Authors:  R Condò; L Cerroni; G Pasquantonio; M Mancini; A Pecora; A Convertino; V Mussi; A Rinaldi; L Maiolo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Tijen Pamir; Bilge Hakan Sen; Ozgür Evcin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Fluorinated Montmorillonite and 3YSZ as the Inorganic Fillers in Fluoride-Releasing and Rechargeable Dental Composition Resin.

Authors:  Keng-Yuan Li; Cheng-Chia Tsai; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Yin-Lin Wang; Feng-Huei Lin; Chun-Pin Lin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.