Literature DB >> 16763357

Phase II study of cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal junction.

Atul Sharma1, V Raina, N Lokeshwar, S V S Deo, N K Shukla, B K Mohanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unresectable and metastatic gastric cancers carry a poor and dismal prognosis. Several phase II studies have identified effective anticancer drugs. AIMS: To evaluate safety and efficacy of low-dose cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel (CEP) based combination chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal junction. SETTING AND
DESIGN: Prospective single-arm phase II study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled onto this study, out of which, all but one received cisplatin 15 mg/m 2, etoposide 40 mg/m 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m 2, given on day 1 and 4 every week for three weeks in a 28-day cycle. Survival analysis was done using SPSS program.
RESULTS: Median age of group was 56 years. Twenty-five were males. Twenty-nine had metastatic/inoperable disease and four patients had recurrent disease. Liver was the commonest metastatic site seen in 15 patients. With a median of 2 cycles per patient, a total of 76 cycles was administered. Grade III or IV toxicity were seen in 11 (35%) patients; diarrhea, 5 patients; vomiting, 3 patients; and neutropenia, 7 patients, 5 of whom also had fever). One patient died of neutropenic fever. Best responses, seen in 32 evaluable patients, were 2 CR (6.1%), 21 PR (63%) and 3 SD (9.2%). Four patients were considered operable after chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 11 months in surviving patients, median OS was 10 months and PFS was 8 months. Median OS was 13 months in responders versus 8 months in nonresponders (P =0.04). Seven patients survived> 12 months.
CONCLUSION: Combination of low-dose CEP shows good clinical response and an acceptable toxicity profile in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal cancers. Whether addition of 5 FU or capecitabine adds to the benefit should be explored. This may be tested with other standard/conventional protocols in a randomized fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763357     DOI: 10.4103/0019-509x.25770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Cancer        ISSN: 0019-509X            Impact factor:   1.224


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of gastric cancer in Indian population.

Authors:  Mohammed Ibrahim; Kissan Gilbert
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-09

2.  MiR-216b increases cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells by targeting PARP1.

Authors:  Y Liu; Z Niu; X Lin; Y Tian
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.987

3.  Gastric cancer in India.

Authors:  Atul Sharma; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2011-01

4.  MicroRNA-133b targets glutathione S-transferase π expression to increase ovarian cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Jin-Wen Jiao; Kai-Xuan Sun; Zhi-Hong Zong; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Community Setting-Practice and Outcomes.

Authors:  Joe Abdo; Carrie A Bertellotti; David L Cornell; Devendra K Agrawal; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  LncRNA ANRIL affects the sensitivity of ovarian cancer to cisplatin via regulation of let-7a/HMGA2 axis.

Authors:  Jin-Tian Miao; Jian-Hua Gao; Yong-Qian Chen; Hong Chen; Hao-Yi Meng; Ge Lou
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.